Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Narcissus reality and painting.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Narcissus reality and painting.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2011 at 15:08:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info A transposition on paper of narcissus. created, uploaded and nominated by Angel.
Support It's one of my paintings and i want to see if the image is good.
Oppose I don't see how this comparison/collage adds any encyclopedic value to the actual flower's picture. In addition, it's too small and the flower on the left seems distorted. Tomer T (talk) 15:17, 2 May 2011 (UTC)- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, the image is far bellow the 2MPx requirements, the bad crop, low quality and apparent distortion of the left photograph. Sting (talk) 15:31, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support the illustration of the difference between a photographic reality and a painted reality is exciting. GerardM (talk) 15:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- OpposePer others above.--Jebulon (talk) 16:33, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Too small picture - 0.83 Mp only, but at least 2 Mp request. Bad crop and distorted proportion photo (compare with uploaded before photo). Idea and painting is nice, but this candidate has no chance. -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose ???? and per Sting. W.S. 01:14, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Photograph: See my previous vote on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Narcisa 0012.JPG. Painting: The stamens look flat, shadows should be added to increase depth.--Snaevar (talk) 09:18, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
Comment File:Narcissus reality and painting montage-CN.jpg --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:25, 3 May 2011 (UTC)
- Better than first. Thank you kaʁstn -- Angel 19:10 3 May 2011
Question for both: Why did you paint a white flower yellow? -- One, please. ( Thank you.) 14:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I put another picture Angel (talk) 17:27 9 May 2011
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:47, 10 May 2011 (UTC)
