Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nancy Porte Here BW 2015-07-18 13-45-47.jpg

File:Nancy Porte Here BW 2015-07-18 13-45-47.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Mar 2016 at 12:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Nancy Porte Here BW 2015-07-18 13-45-47.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nancy Porte Here BW 2015-07-18 13-45-47.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created - uploaded - nominated -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 12:41, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support sehr kompakt, sehr stimmig! --Hubertl 12:51, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:52, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose A good QI, but I miss something extraordinary --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:24, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
• Moderate  Support - I basically agree with Uoaei1 that this is not an incredibly extraordinary photo, but it's a very good, very well-composed photo of a beautiful gate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:14, 18 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Comment as per Uoaei1, but I think the image could be noticeably improved by cropping to a wider format. I have put my crop suggestion into an annotation. -- Rftblr (talk) 17:30, 18 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment - Your crop suggestion seems like an improvement to me. Would you like to offer it as an alternative? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:52, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Comment It is not my image, and therefore for Berthold Werner to decide if he would like to offer a cropped version. -- Rftblr (talk) 22:01, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Oppose Looking at it I was wondering whether it is a street scene focusing on people and atmosphere or an architecture picture. I think the monument and lack of people in the foreground suggest the latter and for that I find that group of people in front of the gate pretty disturbing. Like Uoaei I miss something here (e.g. nice lighting with less tourists) Poco² 09:04, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Peer poco --The Photographer (talk) 18:16, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Poco. INeverCry 18:27, 19 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Moderate support I can reconcile the architectural aspect with the street aspect. It is used by people on a daily basis, rather than being roped off at a distance, so people in the picture is natural and expected. Daniel Case (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 16:25, 27 March 2016 (UTC)