Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mute Swan Emsworth2.JPG

File:Mute Swan Emsworth2.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Mar 2013 at 23:13:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Mute Swan Emsworth2.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mute Swan Emsworth2.JPG

•  Info created by Geni - uploaded by Geni - nominated by Geni -- Geni (talk) 23:13, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
• Already a Featured picture on the english wikipedia. Support -- Geni (talk) 23:13, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Comment This is a beautiful photograph but there's a very similar featured picture. I personally think there should be only one featured picture of a similar composition of a species. Not sure what the rules are for featuring very similar photographs but will support if that's not an issue. -- ~y (talk) 10:44, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support Because this picture is better, with sharp focus on the head. Yathin, we don't have such a rule (unlike in EN:FP); but people can vote based on their stands (or even make a delist request). JKadavoor Jee 11:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:18, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support -- ~y (talk) 13:55, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Support —Bruce1ee^talk 18:08, 28 February 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose The quality is not bad, but for me it is nothing special and has no wow-effect Hockei (talk) 21:21, 1 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose The quality is good but to make a picture of a swan stand out you have to make something extra - Averater (talk) 15:02, 2 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose as above --LC-de (talk) 07:37, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
•  Oppose me too --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:37, 11 March 2013 (UTC)