Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo Guggenheim -- 2021 -- Bilbao, Euskadi, España.jpg

File:Museo Guggenheim -- 2021 -- Bilbao, Euskadi, España.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2023 at 12:33:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Museo Guggenheim -- 2021 -- Bilbao, Euskadi, España.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Museo Guggenheim -- 2021 -- Bilbao, Euskadi, España.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
•  Info all by me -- Alu (talk) 12:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alu (talk) 12:33, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Interesting, but I'm not sure what the ruling would be at COM:Deletion requests on the sculpture in front. Is it de minimis? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:26, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment The same question applies to the building itself – it is certainly artistic, so if it was located e.g. in France this photo would problematic/illegal. But luckily, if I understand our article right, Spain has proper freedom of panorama, so the photo should be OK. --Aristeas (talk) 11:12, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment No issue for me here, the sculpture is De minimis and the Freedom of Panorama works for building and 3D artwork in Spain. --PierreSelim (talk) 22:07, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

• You're an admin here, so thanks for clarifying.  Support. Good composition, and I like how the people look kind of like ants in the context of the grand scale of these structures. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:18, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment Thanks! I have already put the template FoP Spain. -- Alu (talk) 09:24, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Comment Technically speaking, I'm not an admin anymore, but I've been for 10 years. --PierreSelim (talk) 07:15, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Comment I see. I was relying on your user page for that information. But anyway, you presumably have the experience to understand the application of de minimis in Spain. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:38, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Sharp, good composition. Some red areas like the arch are very saturated, but other photos show that these are really very bright reds and the rendering works well in the context. --Aristeas (talk) 10:33, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

• You're right. I think it's better now. The arches remain their natural red. -- Alu (talk) 19:01, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

• Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 19:02, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Support --Harlock81 (talk) 12:07, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Uninspiring framing. I know the building well, and there's no wow factor. Cluttered bottom, sorry but it looks like a simple vacation picture. --Fernando (talk) 19:42, 6 November 2023 (UTC)

   Comment Thanks for your comment. Normally the usual photographs that represent this museum are of its northeast face, which would be the bow of the ship it simulates. However, I love this less common view, from the stern, forming a whole with the bridge that, like the other view, also fits into the golden ratio. And also, as Ikan said above, you can see the great dimension of the construction compared to the people. -- Alu (talk) 00:07, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Support Could possibly be improved by 1/2 to 2/3 EV exposure boost. --Argenberg (talk) 12:07, 8 November 2023 (UTC).

  •  Comment Better now. The shadows were very dark and there were areas of the sun's reflection that were too bright. Thanks for the input. -- Alu (talk) 23:56, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

•  Support ★ 19:34, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 05:52, 9 November 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 13:58, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain