Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mumiae, Museum für Hamburgische Geschichte IMG 1897 edit.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Mumiae, Museum für Hamburgische Geschichte IMG 1897 edit.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Feb 2012 at 12:28:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Mummia in a box
  •  Info Mummia in a box, pharmacists collection of the hamburgmuseum - created, edited, uploaded and nominated by PETER WEIS TALK 12:28, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment da fehlt für meinen Geschmack eindeutig (irgend)ein Größenvergleich. Ich kann mir gerade überhaupt nicht vorstellen wie groß diese Box ist (English a size comparison is sadly missed here IMO) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 16:03, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Die korrekte Beschreibungen und Metadaten werden aus dem Museum nachgeliefert. Ein Datenexport erfolgt demnächst und war bei Erstellung technisch nicht möglich. So viel vorab: die Box ist etwa so groß wie eine Hand. Oben auf kannst du den Inhalt der Schachtel sehen. Das ist etwa so feinkörnig wie feiner Sand. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 21:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose - entire object should be sharp for FP. --Claritas (talk) 22:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
    • Why? --LC-de (talk) 18:47, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
      • It is good to show detail through the whole image in an encyclopedic picture. Blur is good for artistic pics, but sharpness is necessary here. It depends on the use of the image. --Paolo Costa (talk) 12:18, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • Not at all. It depends on the photographer's decision. It's hard for me to understand what makes you believe that the whole object should be in focus. Using that shallow depth of field and having this bokeh was created intentionally. Using a larger aperture would provide insufficient optical resolution and therefore less sharpness. The faded label does not provide a distinct sharpness. Yet one can estimate the focal point when looking at the Mummia atop of the box. Regards, PETER WEIS TALK 21:21, 3 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
        • what Details do you expect on the rear of this box? --LC-de (talk) 09:10, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I was answering to a question in general terms, of why people usually gives a negative vote on this page, with shallow depth of field as the reason for it. I did not oppose, even if I must say I would have liked it more focused on this white background, through the whole image even if there's nothing to see - a matter of personal taste. --Paolo Costa (talk) 21:34, 5 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 6 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]