Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg

File:Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2011 at 22:40:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Moscow July 2011-4a.jpg

•  Info Saint Basil's Cathedral, Red Square, Moscow. Erected in 1555-61, on the order of Ivan the Terrible. Photographed from west, under a beautiful evening light. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:40, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support I reall like the colors. --Ritchyblack (talk) 04:29, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:30, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support mickit 07:18, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support —stay (sic)! 09:43, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support sehr detailreich --Böhringer (talk) 10:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Tomer T (talk) 13:31, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Jebulon (talk) 16:21, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice, but the crop is rather tight on the bottom. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:34, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral I agree with THFSW.   ■ MMXX  ^talk  21:13, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral me too, plus the shadows are a bit harsh/dark for my taste. Otherwise it really would be featured. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:02, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Info -- Yes, I agree that the crop on the bottom is way too tight. But the alternative was worse, as the space in the foreground was crowded with tourists. Not only they were too distracting for the gorgeous subject but stitching those photos would have been close to impossible. A shame, really. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:31, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Neutral Very nice but the strong shadow in the lower right corner is a bit unfortunate. --Jovian Eye _talk 12:07, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. --Georgez (talk) 12:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too tight crop at the bottom, and unpleasant shadow in the right bottom corner. --Lošmi (talk) 01:02, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose QI, but not FP, per Lošmi, nice colours is not sufficient as criteria for an outstanding picture --Wladyslaw (talk) 16:59, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR (talk) 19:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support If there was no crop at the bottom, then all the mass of people in front of the cathedral at this day time would disturb, I suppose. The other possible camera perspective which provides good light at early morning (own example) is less fortunate than this one, due to less available details of the cathedral facade. - A.Savin 11:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

• your picture is related to the crop better than this candidate --Wladyslaw (talk) 14:19, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

•  Oppose Good image but.. I don't like the shadow in the right bottom. I think it is feasible to have an image from the same angle without this shadow. Ggia (talk) 03:59, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Support The shadow and the tight crop do disturb, yes, but not nearly enough to discredit such a beautiful pic. It's to be featured imo. Tourists can't just disappear, could be the best crop possible at day. Paolo (talk) 18:54, 28 July 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 4 neutral → featured. /--Jovian Eye _storm 00:33, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas