Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montane Birch forests in Torkilstöten (winter).jpg

File:Montane Birch forests in Torkilstöten (winter).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2012 at 19:40:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Montane Birch forests in Torkilstöten (winter).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Montane Birch forests in Torkilstöten (winter).jpg

•  Info created , uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:40, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Sorry, the overall composition appears random to me. Also, the trunk in the foreground unattractively subdivides the image into two (sub)equal parts. --Cayambe (talk) 10:01, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Though the tree in the foreground is there, and I see what you mean about it splitting up the picture, this does not necessarily decrease the value. I like the focus, however, and like it. Pteronura brasiliensis (talk) 02:13, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Like Cayambe. --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:06, 28 December 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose It needs more closeup view to have a bigger focus distinction of the main subject from the rest of the forest. At least that's a way how I'd like the picture. :-) Aktron (talk) 19:11, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose artistic, but too messy for an encyclopedia. --Paolo Costa (talk) 22:13, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose - Lack of sharpness. Tiptoety ^talk 04:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Claritas (talk) 16:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)