Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mangga Dua Jakarta's Chinatown.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Mangga Dua Jakarta's Chinatown.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2010 at 17:45:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Jakob Montrasio - uploaded by Midori - nominated by Arsonal -- Arsonal (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Arsonal (talk) 17:45, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
Oppose strange black corners, noisy and strange-blue sky, blurry at the left, perspective distortion, 
chromatic aberration. The composition is interesting. But the image isn't featured at all --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 18:00, 11 June 2010 (UTC)- Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, Oversatured Flickr kitsch! --mathias K 18:20, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support To remove inappropriate FPX explanation. --Lošmi (talk) 01:22, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Inappropriate submission. The FPX explanation was matter-of-fact. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 03:07, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Flickr kitsch. Diti the penguin — 08:55, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose cheap special effects ruin it --ianaré (talk) 18:08, 12 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above. Strong vignetting in the corners. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:02, 13 June 2010 (UTC)
Comment, how the hell is this flickr kitsch? It's not HDR and the colours are perfectly natural. The perspective is due to the use of an ultra-wide lens. No, I won't support it; it's just not interesting enough in my opinion, and the vignetted corners don't look very good. But you can't just slap the label "flickr kitsch" onto everything you don't like. --Aqwis (talk) 11:55, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- The colours are perfectly natural?? Is that a joke? In my opinion it don't need to be HDR to be Oversatured (what this pic is) Flickr (thats where the pic came from) Kitsch (thats what the pic look for me). But that is just my opinion, that dont need to be true as User:Lošmi allready showed.
- Newsflash, strong colours exist in reality. The only oversaturated part of the picture is possibly the sky, but that might be because the picture is a little bit underexposed. --Aqwis (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- What? Strong colours in real life? Can't believe! I allways think and see b/w.
As a compromiss: In future I will be more carefull with the using of Oversatured Flickr Kitsch. I promise! bg mathias K 15:17, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- What? Strong colours in real life? Can't believe! I allways think and see b/w.
- Newsflash, strong colours exist in reality. The only oversaturated part of the picture is possibly the sky, but that might be because the picture is a little bit underexposed. --Aqwis (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- The colours are perfectly natural?? Is that a joke? In my opinion it don't need to be HDR to be Oversatured (what this pic is) Flickr (thats where the pic came from) Kitsch (thats what the pic look for me). But that is just my opinion, that dont need to be true as User:Lošmi allready showed.
- Oppose, for the reasons stated above. --Aqwis (talk) 15:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose for all reasons given above, and because maybe this one will persuade an admin to put this one out of its misery. Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose --Brackenheim (talk) 16:58, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 20:19, 20 June 2010 (UTC)
