Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maman de Louise Bourgeois - Bilbao.jpg

File:Maman de Louise Bourgeois - Bilbao.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Oct 2017 at 10:25:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Maman de Louise Bourgeois - Bilbao.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maman de Louise Bourgeois - Bilbao.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
•  Info created by Archaeodontosaurus - uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Basotxerri -- Basotxerri (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Comment I saw this by accident and I think it's good enough to be a FP. --Basotxerri (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support -- Basotxerri (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support This picture has some imperfections, but the moment was rare. He had just made a thunderstorm light was unusual and above all there was no one. I found myself alone in front of Maman. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:52, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

• Yes, that's one of the points. Besides the composition, the interesting lighting and the for Bilbao very representive wet ground, I like the absence of people which isn't easy to get these days. --Basotxerri (talk) 17:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support There may be some imperfections, but with a creature right out of War of the Worlds and lighting from Blade Runner the wow is huge! I would also have nominated it if I had found it first. --cart-Talk 17:25, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Big wow! --MZaplotnik^(talk) 21:31, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral It's a nice capture, but image quality is suffering in the background (not a huge problem though) and the processing is not particularly impressive - dark and low in contrast (reducing the "wow"). Do you have a RAW file for this image? I'd love to have a play with it if you do -- Thennicke (talk) 00:44, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

• @Archaeodontosaurus: What do you think, would it be possible? --Basotxerri (talk) 06:50, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

I'm going to search but I have to remember and it's the most difficult. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:58, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

•  Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:09, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Too noisy. Especially dark noise. There are many artefacts. --Hockei (talk) 17:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like it for the same reasons cart does, and so many more, but I would like to be able to see the metadata on this image so we have some idea if it might be improved more in processing. Daniel Case (talk) 03:00, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wow for the sculpture, not for the photo. The bad weather and light pollution has made for a ugly brown overcast sky. The subject is also confused with the background at this angle. File:Bilbao Guggenheim (28746928753).jpg has a better angle and light, though shame it doesn't capture the whole creature. (Please embed a colour profile too). -- Colin (talk) 12:41, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose Disturbing background, probably from another angle this pictuce could be much better. --Karelj (talk) 20:22, 24 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support --Yann (talk) 10:11, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice shot and mood. --Selbymay (talk) 12:22, 25 October 2017 (UTC)
•  Oppose per other opposers --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:56, 26 October 2017 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 15:34, 30 October 2017 (UTC)