Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maly Krashokholmsky bridge 4exp Oloneo.jpg

File:Maly Krashokholmsky bridge 4exp Oloneo.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Mar 2014 at 10:18:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Maly Krashokholmsky bridge 4exp Oloneo.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Maly Krashokholmsky bridge 4exp Oloneo.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Kaluga.2012 - nominated by A.Savin 10:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --A.Savin 10:18, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:04, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 15:37, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --DAJF (talk) 16:02, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Brackenheim (talk) 19:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:21, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 06:11, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:49, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Weak oppose I like the colors and the quality is good but a centered composition without any extraordinary elements in it makes me decline. I just cannot see anything featurable in that bridge and the lights are also a bit distracting, sorry. Poco² 10:30, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Chmee2 (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow, per Poco.--Claus (talk) 16:32, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral Quality, light and colors are nice, but the composition is completely disorganized. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:53, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Neither composition nor subject convince me. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 11:18, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
• weak  Support the weak is for the saturation, a bit too much for my tastes, but however nice. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:43, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Background is too busy, foreground is too busy, the main object just doesn't stand out. --Rutake (talk) 09:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Per Claus. --Mile (talk) 17:09, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment That seems odd. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 19:21, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
•  Support —Blurred Lines 17:17, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 16:16, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges