Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magnifying glass with focus on paper.png

File:Magnifying glass with focus on paper.png, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 May 2011 at 10:08:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Magnifying glass with focus on paper.png Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Magnifying glass with focus on paper.png

• 
  Infinite DOF (unrealistic, you wont see this in nature)
• 
  DOF with focus on glass itself (realistic, blurry content, still rendering)

•  Info created, uploaded, nominated by Niabot
  Note: This image is part of a series. This uses DOF with focus on the content (realistic, since DOF needs to be further away then the glass itself). It does not contain EXIF data nor a color profile. It assumes sRGB as the default color space for 24 bit graphics. It has no lens distortion.
•  Abstain as creator and nominator -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 10:08, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- Raghith 10:37, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support -- A superb illustration of the subject and a good example of what the modern rendering techniques can do. Some other categories related to the technique (and 'dof' ?) should be added though. A minor criticism: the handle of the glass is a little too short imo. Alternatively, the image could be cropped a bit at left and right. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose No, I think the background is inconvenient, and the focus of the magnifying glas is too small in comparison to the rest. --Yikrazuul (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
  • I agree, but it is easily fixed by cropping at left and right. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice work. Agree with Alves. --Slaunger (talk) 20:17, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support As per my previous personal comment on the nominator's talk page. --Jebulon (talk) 13:09, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support Nice work.--Ankara (talk) 16:17, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Request Please can you add information about the copyright and source of the text on the page. --99of9 (talk) 00:46, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Added to the description -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 08:01, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support It looks realistic to me, and it also looks beautiful to me ;) Support ! - Benh (talk) 19:38, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Snaevar (talk) 23:49, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose The depth of field seems unnaturally shallow to me. I don't know what the DOF of the human eye is, but I'm guessing it's deeper than this. If I were reading a piece of paper like this, I'd certainly see both the magnifying glass and the magnified words to be nearly sharp. --99of9 (talk) 10:06, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Vision unphysiological. A magnifying glass is held parallel to the plane of the object that you want to see. art installation that has no encyclopedic value. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:10, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
  • It is a technical illustration for DOF in renderers. If this is art and a reason to oppose, then we should close FPC. -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 10:54, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
  • Do you read the sheets diagonally, with a magnifying glass? No. Why not having a normal way? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:10, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
    • Is this of any importance if i read my paper from bottom to top and right to left or even mirrored? Does it not illustrate the DOF anymore? -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 14:15, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Paddy (talk) 19:11, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose Most parts within the glass are also blurry --Llez (talk) 19:31, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
  • It has to be that way... -- ／人◕ ‿‿ ◕人＼ 苦情処理係 20:24, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose, sorry. Large project, some work, but result has no wow factor for me. Also DOF imitation is too low. -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:08, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:49, 31 May 2011 (UTC)