Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Madakaripura Waterfall - Indonesia.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Madakaripura Waterfall - Indonesia.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2019 at 10:28:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Snowmanstudios - uploaded by Snowmanstudios - nominated by Mimihitam -- Mimihitam (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Support -- Mimihitam (talk) 10:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)- \WOW :-) -- Eatcha (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Oppose Impressive view, yes, but I'm bothered not the whole waterfall is rendered sharp. I get the feeling the focus was set too close and my DoF calculator tells me the hyperfocal distance could have been used here. The sky is blown on some parts and there's lens flare on the extreme right. – Lucas 12:17, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
Comment I would support if the lens flare is corrected. --Yann (talk) 12:59, 20 June 2019 (UTC)- Comment thanks for your input, changed the WB, removed the bottle and the fences, the visible "lensflare" is from a water droplet on the GND-filter, but yes, looks far better without. @LucasBosch: you meant this "lensflare" on the left side, not on the right, correct? and your DoF calculator, I mean, I get the feeling whatever... --Snowmanstudios (talk) 17:24, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support Much better now! --Uoaei1 (talk) 16:28, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I meant the lens flare on the right, I hope it is one. You might be able to change my and other's opinions (see below) about the distant out of focus parts if you cared to explain instead of quibbling about a DoF calculator. – Lucas 18:59, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm struggling with my vote so far, because the photo has something special - the wow - but it's super-unsharp on the upper left. I think I can tolerate the apparent little lens flare on the right, but is there any way you could improve the sharpness and definition on the upper left? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:21, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm mostly bothered by that gray-ish patch in the shadows up right. It looks exactly like what you get when you try to raise something from very dark areas where there is little or no info other than darkness. On the whole, the post-processing looks a bit shoddy. Granted it is a very difficult subject light-wise, but I'd welcome a more natural look. --Cart (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2019 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:16, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
Neutral Per the opposes, but I don't feel like opposing it right now. --Boothsift 21:58, 21 June 2019 (UTC)- Support With everyone talking about the unsharp bit, I was expecting it to be really obviously terrible, but it’s only a small part of the image and isn’t very distracting. Overall I like it a lot, notwithstanding some flaws. Cmao20 (talk) 23:04, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose For me, it's the distortion at upper left and the halo around the cliff edge, suggesting that it was overdarkened. Daniel Case (talk) 00:05, 23 June 2019 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:25, 29 June 2019 (UTC)
