Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MAERSK HANOI Container Ship (Port Koper SIKOP, 2023).jpg

File:MAERSK HANOI Container Ship (Port Koper SIKOP, 2023).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Feb 2024 at 15:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:MAERSK HANOI Container Ship (Port Koper SIKOP, 2023).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:MAERSK HANOI Container Ship (Port Koper SIKOP, 2023).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
•  Info Maersk Hanoi container ship at Koper Port. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 15:46, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Юрий Д.К 19:03, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 19:12, 29 January 2024 (UTC)
  • There is a perspective problem on the right side. ★ 03:32, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Uneven composition. Too uneven to consider this one of this site's finest pictures. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support Striking colours and composition Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 20:16, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:45, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose The containers at the back of the ship fall off at the next major well. On one container in the middle you can only see Maers without the K. Was that retouched out?--Ermell (talk) 09:21, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

• Ermell All is original. Its a drone shot. Doing PD here wont bring any good. I have tried. --Mile (talk) 17:41, 31 January 2024 (UTC)

•  Oppose ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:20, 31 January 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Info PD corected. Check again all. Ermell, ^{(keep talking)}, Poco a poco. --Mile (talk) 18:49, 3 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Info Overslept it, extacly that what ★ said. Take it as all. Corecting PD just wont go. Back to original. Corecting stong PD wont go, enjoy picture as it is. --Mile (talk) 08:39, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Unfortunately, neither one nor the other convinces me. What a pity. You are too close to the object with the drone so that the perspective is difficult to correct. I will not comply with the unfriendly request you left on my discussion page to keep me away from your nominations. Everyone has the right to judge other people's pictures. That the objections were not unfounded can be seen from the fact that I am not alone in my opinion.--Ermell (talk) 10:21, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:02, 4 February 2024 (UTC)
•  Oppose Compo is good, light too. But at full size, it's like smartphone quality, I don't like the textures. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 23:02, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)