Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2022 -- 4266.jpg

File:Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2022 -- 4266.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Dec 2022 at 08:23:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2022 -- 4266.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Münster, LWL-Museum für Kunst und Kultur, Lichtkunstwerk "Silberne Frequenz" -- 2022 -- 4266.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors
•  Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 08:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- XRay 💬 08:23, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support - Benh (talk) 08:45, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose - No any reason for FP nomination, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 13:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)

  Could you explain by what you mean by "[n]o any reason for FP nomination"? --SHB2000 (talk) 07:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)

  @Karelj: courtesy ping SHB2000 (talk) 22:15, 24 December 2022 (UTC)

  There is IHMO comment, which means, that this is my opinion and I do not force anybody to have the same one. But OK, in category Lichtskulptur "Silberne Frequenz" is several snaps of this really very nice sculpture, showing it as whole or more complex. But the image here looks, like from child, who receivd his first photoaparate and learns, how to operate with it. IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 09:38, 25 December 2022 (UTC)

  You are free to have your own opinion, but when you say that the nominator had no reason to nominate this in the first place, then you're essentially saying that their perception of the image is so out of the blue. Your explanation is understandable, though. SHB2000 (talk) 04:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Support I disagree. Enjoyable rhythm, and one of the best of this interesting series of photos of this sculpture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:36, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Even though I prefer some of the other images from the series to this one, I see this as an excellent image of an interesting work of art that well deserves the FP badge --Kritzolina (talk) 20:21, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Wieggy (talk) 22:14, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 22:43, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Definite FP material. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:43, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 10:46, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:30, 20 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:09, 20 December 2022 (UTC)

  Double vote. --A.Savin 01:06, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Fun interplay of geometrical patterns -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 02:03, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per Basile and IK. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:55, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:48, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Lupe (talk) 16:10, 22 December 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:45, 28 December 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures_outdoors