Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Louvre and Tuilerie.jpg

File:Louvre and Tuilerie.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2011 at 20:37:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Louvre and Tuilerie.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Louvre and Tuilerie.jpg

•  Info uploaded by Paris 16 - nominated by Lord Of The Rooms
•  Support -- Lord Of The Rooms (talk) 20:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Account too young, sorry!--Claus (talk) 12:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)

•  Support Rare photographical view of a now disappeared Palace, destroyed by the civil war of the Paris Commune in 1871. High historical & encyclopedic values. There is a project to re-build it.--Jebulon (talk) 23:41, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose maybe high encyclopedic value, but quality is not the best as a "photo d’une photo". Otherwise the nomination could have been more careful too: surely Lord Of The Rooms is neither creator nor uploader. Instead of one file description mixing English with French two separate description would have been preferred. --ELEKHH^T 07:27, 26 June 2011 (UTC).
•  Support The best photo of Tuileries Palace.--Claus (talk) 12:11, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Support --Paris 16 (talk) 09:17, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
•  Question This is of course a very important and valuable document about historical Paris. But is it the best possible reproduction of the original photo? And what about copyrights? It's public domain, yes indeed, but the uploader (Paris 16) is not the person who made the reproduction (P.E. Malissin and F. Valdes: do they know and agree that their reproduction work is on Commons?). -- MJJR (talk) 21:24, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
  • I think copyright should be fine, as a faithful reproduction of the original image with no added element of originality, the reproduction itself cannot be protected by copyright, per Template:PD-Art. --ELEKHH^T 09:36, 2 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose   ■ MMXX  ^talk  13:12, 1 July 2011 (UTC)
•  Oppose good candidate for the Valued Images section, but not for FP. -- H005 14:40, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:04, 5 July 2011 (UTC)