Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:London - Wimbledon - 3065.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:London - Wimbledon - 3065.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Oct 2020 at 21:08:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
Info created by Jorgeroyan - uploaded by Jorgeroyan - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 21:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)
Support -- Andrei (talk) 21:08, 22 September 2020 (UTC)- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 03:01, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Basotxerri (talk) 06:34, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 12:54, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Cmao20 (talk) 14:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:05, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Oppose Yes, it's fun but the edited areas (everything around the guy and his shadow) is too obvious and I'm not really convinced about the compo/crop, specially at the bottom, sorry. This pictures is based on photoshop editing, please, add the Retouched template, too. --Poco a poco (talk) 16:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)- Oppose per Poco. Funny idea but the photoshopping is too obvious IMHO, there are blurry areas around the guy in some of his incarnations. Surely not an easy task to do. I also strongly suggest to add the "Retouched picture" template, and put it into the description. Too much foreground, try to cut the bottom quarter off. --Kreuzschnabel 18:32, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. The composition does not work for me. Too much disturbing foreground. --XRay talk 19:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not at all keen on manipulation of a scene even if it is exaggerated like this. I also agree with Poco a Poco that several of the super-impositions have a blurry/smeared look that suggests the clone tool and its deceptive brethren. On the other hand, I think the composition and exposure are excellent. I just don't like the artifice. (Is there a version of this photo which has just one lawnmower man in it?) --Bobulous (talk) 20:24, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support Yes photoshopping is obvious but well done and produced a very consequent concept of strong and repeated lines made by repeatedly cloned workers.--Augustgeyler (talk) 22:21, 24 September 2020 (UTC)
Weak oppose I actually like the idea and have no problem with clones but the foreground is distracting and should be cropped out --StellarHalo (talk) 04:16, 25 September 2020 (UTC)- Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:04, 25 September 2020 (UTC)
- Oppose; would have been better without the foreground. Daniel Case (talk) 06:32, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 7 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 05:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
