Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Liocarcinus vernalis.jpg

File:Liocarcinus vernalis.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2010 at 23:22:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Liocarcinus vernalis.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Liocarcinus vernalis.jpg

•  Info created and uploaded by Lycaon - nominated by -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC) IdLoveOne (talk) 21:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:22, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Lighting is not the best. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:37, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
  • Could you please state why? Comments like, "bad crop" or "lighting not the best" don't give any indication on how to fix it. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
  •  Info -- Sorry, in this case I thought that the glares from the flash (or whatever light source) would be obvious. Someting I forgot: let the poor thing etc. :) Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:56, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
    • Maybe you should make a template, something like  Let the poor thing breathe. But you think this crop is too tight? It should be easy to fix, since it's on a black background. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:19, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
      • Lol! Yes, I think that the crop is too tight and agree that is easy to fix. But poor lighting is a much worse sin to redeem... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:46, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
        • One more point: if you consider the lighting so bad here, Alvesgaspar, why did you promote it on QIC? --The High Fin Sperm Whale 06:15, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nah. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 16:29, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Needs white balancing. --IdLoveOne (talk) 19:23, 24 October 2010 (UTC)

{{withdraw}}

• Aww, I was gonna support a white balanced version. =( --IdLoveOne (talk) 20:09, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
  • If you really like it you can always nominate yourself (just slash out my name in the 'nominated by' part and replace it with yours). --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:39, 25 October 2010 (UTC)
    • Hmm, ok, it'll lump some of my noms together, but w/e. Thanks! --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:07, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

---

Alt

•  Info Expanded the background. --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Alt 2

•  Info Expanded BG and white balanced. The WB I think raises the brightness and makes the flash less harsh. --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --IdLoveOne (talk) 21:49, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support An improvement to an already excellent image. Well done! --The High Fin Sperm Whale 20:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
  • I just hope it has enough "breathing room" --IdLoveOne (talk) 22:50, 27 October 2010 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination Wrong WB. Lycaon (talk) 13:46, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

• What? Can you do that when I'm the one "nominating" this? --IdLoveOne (talk) 15:31, 1 November 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:57, 2 November 2010 (UTC)