Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leontopodium alpinum in Strada delle 52 Gallerie.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Leontopodium alpinum in Strada delle 52 Gallerie.JPG, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Aug 2012 at 08:06:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Pottercomuneo (talk) 08:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Pottercomuneo (talk) 08:06, 12 August 2012 (UTC)- Support--H. Krisp (talk) 09:10, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Oppose dull colors. Tomer T (talk) 13:24, 12 August 2012 (UTC)- Oppose: Noise, sharpening artifacts, composition, wow. --Julian H. (talk/files) 13:26, 12 August 2012 (UTC)
Comment I've not understood your comment, Julian --Pottercomuneo (talk) 17:44, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- In a little more detail: The photo is very noisy (which is made worse because the noise has then been compressed relatively heavily so that details have been lost). Also, the remaining details have been sharpened so that every detail above a certain sharpness has become very heavily sharpened, in some areas resulting in fully white lines with dark outlines. I also don't think the composition works particularly well as the main subject is located in front of other similarly bright objects that are distracting. And my last point was that the images creates no Wow-emotion in me, what I would expect at least to some extend from a featured picture. I hope that clarifies my comment. --Julian H. (talk/files) 19:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Julian :) --Pottercomuneo (talk) 22:04, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- In a little more detail: The photo is very noisy (which is made worse because the noise has then been compressed relatively heavily so that details have been lost). Also, the remaining details have been sharpened so that every detail above a certain sharpness has become very heavily sharpened, in some areas resulting in fully white lines with dark outlines. I also don't think the composition works particularly well as the main subject is located in front of other similarly bright objects that are distracting. And my last point was that the images creates no Wow-emotion in me, what I would expect at least to some extend from a featured picture. I hope that clarifies my comment. --Julian H. (talk/files) 19:15, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
- Support --VespaVicenza (talk) 07:01, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Depth of field too short (see full resolution), blown areas, and unbalanced composition. Sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 13:35, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose For this type of image must be set manually at least f/10 and a focal largest (the flower is distorted), increasing the exposure time. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:40, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
