Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lago Bianco from Diavolezza 2.jpg

File:Lago Bianco from Diavolezza 2.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Dec 2010 at 20:14:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Lago Bianco from Diavolezza 2.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lago Bianco from Diavolezza 2.jpg

5425

2179

115

1227

5551

3440

??

•  Info Lago Bianco as seen from the Diavolezza cable car, Grisons, Switzerland. created by murdockcrc - uploaded by murdockcrc - nominated by murdockcrc -- Murdockcrc (talk) 20:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Abstain As author -- Murdockcrc (talk) 20:14, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The clouds are overexposed, the mountains are not sharp, a bad stitching error in the lower right.--Mbz1 (talk) 20:46, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment Thank you for your feedback Mbz1. Just for your information, there are only two clouds that are overexposed (according to Photoshop histogram), the rest of the picture is properly exposed. Furthermore, there cannot be a stitching error since this image is made out of one photograph only. There is no stitching done at all. --Murdockcrc (talk) 21:22, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
    • The note is added. It might be not a stitching error, but it is definitely some kind of error.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:27, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
    • Noted, thanks for the input. There is indeed an error there, whose origin I cannot trace back. Anyway, what's the norm here, should I correct the picture and upload it again, or should I withdraw the nomination and nominate a corrected version? --Murdockcrc (talk) 21:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
  • There's no need to withdraw your nomination. The best way is to upload a fixed image over an old one.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:31, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
    • • I think the best thing to do would be to crop the entire image from the right side - just as much as the apparent error goes. Afterall, it's not that much off from the whole landscape. --Ximonic (talk) 22:19, 5 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Mbz1 plus WB off. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 00:46, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

 I withdraw my nomination --Murdockcrc (talk) 06:56, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

•  Info I created an alternative version (see File:Lago Bianco from Diavolezza 2-CN.jpg) with a better WB, better quality (downscaled) and I cropped out the error at the right. --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 14:00, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment Wow, great job, looks definitively improved. At this point I would want to know how to proceed, since I withdrew the nomination. Should I do a new nomination with this image you modified? Any feedback will be greatly appreciated. --Murdockcrc (talk) 15:01, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
    • just strike your withdraw and make a new section with ====Alternative==== and the picture under this comment. That should be enough! Regards --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 15:05, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Alternative

• Alternative version with post-processing done by kaʁstn. --Murdockcrc (talk) 15:21, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support the overexposed clouds are a bit disturbing, but unbelievable dimensions and a great image --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 13:57, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Kooritza (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Overexposed clouds per others. LeavXC (talk) 19:35, 7 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--MASHAUNIX 21:28, 10 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose white balance imo off, partially overexposured --Mbdortmund (talk) 15:19, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Odambrosio (talk) 20:10, 11 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Mbdortmund, plus I liked the previous picture better. --Snaevar (talk) 01:42, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

 In view of the unfair treatment I have received by some users in the community, I withdraw my nomination. If you want more information please click here