Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ksiaz - zamek 01.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Ksiaz - zamek 01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 May 2020 at 08:37:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Poland
- Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:37, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:28, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:34, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Great wow and colors, but some technical notes: The left edge is leaning in a tiny bit, and the right edge is leaning in a bit more. This suggests that there is both keystoning as well as a slight counterclockwise tilt. Also, could you ensure that you have stitched this in rectilinear (aka perspective) mode, as opposed to say cylindrical, and that geometric (e.g. fisheye, pincushion) distortion correction is turned on? If that's already the case then no worries, maybe that's just how the building looks; it seems to be bulging a bit so I just wanted to check. Finally, the WB is just slightly on the green side for my tastes. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:31, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- @Jar.ciurus: Can you please fix? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:38, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Comment I wonder which sharpening method was used here, as it looks both over- and undersharpened to me at the same time. Everyone feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but based on the haloes along strong edges (roofs and walls meeting the sky) I would guess that a bit too much unsharp masking or similar was applied. Textured surfaces (like walls, roofs, and foliage), on the other hand, look a bit soft and flat. Maybe a pinch of increased local contrast/high-pass sharpening/"clarity" would help to make it pop? --El Grafo (talk) 13:03, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support I agree with El Grafo's comments about the photo at full size, but it's fine for a >40mpx file. Try this 10mpx downsample and see how sharp it is - this is clearly FP quality. Cmao20 (talk) 17:44, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 21:19, 3 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:19, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. Of course, if the tilt recognized by King could be fixed, and if the sharpening could be improved (as El Grafo rightly states), the photo would be even better. @Jar.ciurus: Your photo is worth the additional effort ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 13:07, 4 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support--Llez (talk) 16:59, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao Daniel Case (talk) 17:42, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, lighting and motif Poco a poco (talk) 19:08, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
- Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:57, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:39, 7 May 2020 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Poland