Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kreta - Bucht von Malia1.jpg

File:Kreta - Bucht von Malia1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2014 at 17:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Kreta - Bucht von Malia1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kreta - Bucht von Malia1.jpg

•  Info amazing view at the different landscape types of Crete and the Bay of Malia, high resolution (approx. 110 MP) view with many interesting details; all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 17:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 17:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose notably curved horizon, harsh mid-day light, stitching issues on the bottom right corner (sharp and blurry frames). --Ivar (talk) 19:51, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

(1) absolutely straight horizons for such wide angles of panoramic views are unnatural. (2) harsh light? I see no overexposed parts here (3) stitching issues: hardly to see, not significant for the image impression, even in 100% view of this irrelevant image part --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:56, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

Yes: our world isn't flat. The world is round, since Copernicus and Plato :-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:52, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

The most of the buildings are with "blown out highlights" (ausgefressenen lichtern). I think this image is a bit overexposed. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:15, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Info (1) I have eliminated some minor clone errors that Julian H. mentioned, (2) I have darkend the image a nuance (3) precised the location data by adding a description and the geo code of the camera location --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

•  Support I disagree concerning the horizon, I think that in a 180+°-panorama (almost 360 here?), the horizon is the main horizontal element in the photo and the panorama rotation axis should therefore be aligned to that. But the resolution and detail is fantastic and the other issues have been fixed, it's FP for me now. — Julian H.^✈(talk/files) 15:28, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice.   • Richard • [®] • 18:48, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Gelungene Komposition. --ST ○ 15:40, 8 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support very nice. --Pölkkyposkisolisti (talk) 21:38, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Support /St1995 14:17, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral blown whites + some visible stitching points, however a very good panorama, maybe it could be used somewhere --A.Savin 11:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Jee 02:24, 14 January 2014 (UTC)