Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Khachkars.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Khachkars.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2012 at 11:11:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by Arantz -- Arantz (talk) 11:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
Support -- Arantz (talk) 02:21, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Oppose
- To compare with an other thing, this sculptures have more than 3 times longer history than USA. Arantz (talk) 20:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- That maybe makes the subject interesting, but it doesn't make the photo impressive. Tomer T (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- After the processing, I cannot say it has no wow. Tomer T (talk) 14:51, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- That maybe makes the subject interesting, but it doesn't make the photo impressive. Tomer T (talk) 20:41, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- To compare with an other thing, this sculptures have more than 3 times longer history than USA. Arantz (talk) 20:11, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Info Arantz, every digital photo needs a developing to show the real colours in the photo. In this case I made the developing for you. You can return to your first image if you don't like my developing. I tried to help you. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:23, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hi, friend, thanks, but what I actually wanted was not to do graphics, anyway, let it be. Arantz (talk) 22:56, 18 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support Like the current version. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 07:12, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with some of the processing, but feel it is now overprocessed. In particular I feel the sky colours are now unnatural, but I would also prefer a less contrast on the stones and ground. --99of9 (talk) 14:37, 19 July 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /PierreSelim (talk) 06:07, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
