Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Karl-Theodor Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Karl-Theodor Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jan 2011 at 23:05:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by PETER WEIS TALK 23:05, 21 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Heed the personality rights: Personality rights warning and the OTRS-Permission by Karl-Theodor Freiherr von und zu Guttenberg. See for example File:Adi Holzer by Sabine von der Decken 2010 (No. 1).jpg --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:00, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- -- More or less on-topic... Please help me out. This gentleman is a well-known politician; this picture, according to the description, was taken on the occasion of a more or less public event (a speech at a congres center, with probably several hundred people attending). What is exactly the relation betweenpersonality rights and pictures taken of this sort of "public people" in this sort of circumstances? As to his necktie: a gentleman of this lineage should know how to tie a necktie cirrectly. No points awarded here. MartinD (talk) 15:45, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose: Nice technically, but more of a Quality Image than a Featured Picture in my opinion. TFCforever (talk) 05:20, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support a very good portrait, and that even in public domain! Good quality, composition seems okay to me, no disturbing background. One of the best pictures of Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg that we have! Clearly FP to me, and especially because of the necktie :-) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:29, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support Very good. French caption added.--Jebulon (talk) 10:50, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support for the necktie ;-) Ggia (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Citron (talk) 11:41, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:44, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment -- Nice bokeh and not downsampled. Let me see if I know some other words. Downsampledbokeh (talk) 20:36, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Good quality, but composition is such-such - torso could be wider (arms). --Mile (talk) 22:46, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support - excellent. -- Felix König ✉ 17:50, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose I see nothing noteworthy or educational about the subject. Jon C (talk) 18:23, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose As Jon C. W.S. 06:50, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Nothing educational nor noteworthy ? This man is the federal minister of defense of Germany...--Jebulon (talk) 18:55, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Probably no one knows (or cares about) who was the minister of defense in 1991, and posterity will judge likewise this fine gentleman. It's within the powers of the 20 most influential person in each of the G20 to commission a technically great picture; do we want all of them to be featured picture? This is a quality picture, not a FP. Jon C (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I'm probably wrong. Let's be politically correct, and support only ethnic portraits, as usual.--Jebulon (talk) 01:22, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per Mile.--Snaevar (talk) 14:45, 25 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support for quality and important subject, despite composition. --Avenue (talk) 10:02, 26 January 2011 (UTC)
- Neutral -- IdLoveOne (talk) 07:42, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Weak support--Miguel Bugallo 19:10, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
- Support thanks to those supporting, jebulon for providing the french caption and those stating a constructive critique. a blasé side glance to whom it may concern. regards, PETER WEIS TALK 11:37, 30 January 2011 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 31 January 2011 (UTC)