Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jetty at Gullmarsvik on a rainy day.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Jetty at Gullmarsvik on a rainy day.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2017 at 15:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Sweden
- Info A very wonky jetty (side view) over the mudflats in a bay of Gullmarn fjord. All by me, -- cart-Talk 15:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support -- cart-Talk 15:32, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
NeutralIt has insufficient dof but don't want to oppose on that alone. I'm still digesting the sky which seems (heavily?) edited as it's hard to believe this dynamic is a naturally occurring phenomenon. Still it looks good. I shalt revisit this in a few days and make a decision then. -- KennyOMG (talk) 18:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hi KennyOMG, yes I've upped the contrast a bit and played a little with the color curves plus some local adjustments. But if you want to check out how the two original photos I had looked like, they are in my dropbox (unedited jpegs straight from the camera) one with 0,0 EV and one with +0.3 EV. Please let me know if my attempt at drama is over the top. :) --cart-Talk 19:35, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Came back to Support this but unfortunately it seems my vote is not going to do anything here. :( -- KennyOMG (talk) 23:13, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Don't worry KennyOMG, it's the thought that counts. :) Thanks! --cart-Talk 09:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support - Good composition, and the processing doesn't seem extreme at all to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:07, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Ikan, like I've said on other nominations, we get some spectacular cloud formations here along the coastline. Sometimes, like this time, when a weather front comes in from the sea, you can see the sharp line in the sky with nice fluffy clouds and blue sky on one side and a dark looming 'carpet' on the other. Think I'll try to get a photo of one next time. --cart-Talk 21:15, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- I look forward to seeing it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:19, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support I like the subtle shades and the forms. Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 03:55, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Neutral The editing makes the whole thing look too grey, with not enough clarity. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:46, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the comment. I think you might be right, you have a keen eye. I've uploaded a new version with just the HDR and some very small light adjustments, no playing with the color curves. Pinging voters to see what you think: KennyOMG, Ikan Kekek, Daniel Case, Martin Falbisoner, King of Hearts. --cart-Talk 10:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- I see that it's been lightened, but I still don't notice a significant increase in contrast. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:10, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Fixed. --cart-Talk 09:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Fine with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:56, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition --Michielverbeek (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2017 (UTC)
Confirmed results: