Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Janellemonae (300dpi).jpg

File:Janellemonae (300dpi).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Aug 2010 at 02:54:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Janellemonae (300dpi).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Janellemonae (300dpi).jpg

655

2049

608

1205

2848

4288

A bit "flicker" here.

•  Info created by Rehes - uploaded by Rehes - nominated by Bobamnertiopsis -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 02:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 02:54, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Dynamic portrait of a favorite artist of mine, but the blurring around the hand is unfortunate. Steven Walling 03:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment Yeah, that's what I was worried about. If this fails FPC, I might try to hit up Rehes who has a Flickr with more images of Monáe from the same event, some of which probably feature less blurry hands. Maybe. Anyway, this is the only CC one he has, but I could bug him about it. Anyway, I'll let this one go through FPC first. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 03:29, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Is dance-blur such a bad thing? As long as it's not the head it might actually add dynamism to the image... --99of9 (talk) 03:59, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose The blurring around the hand is bad but the number of clashing of lights here damages its composition. Its very hard to get Featured Fotos in a live concert. There are bright spots and shadows everwhere and you cannot hide them. Sorry. --Korman (talk) 05:32, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Κατά The quality of the picture is not very good. I agree with Korman that it' s very hard to get featured photos in a live concert. Thank you, --патриот8790^{Say whatever you want} 09:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Beautiful concert shot. It's a shame the dumb rules here aren't made for this type of image. --Calibas (talk) 21:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - ditto to the others - MPF (talk) 22:00, 5 August 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /99of9 (talk) 13:11, 14 August 2010 (UTC)