Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Jama Masjid, Delhi.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Jama Masjid, Delhi.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jul 2012 at 10:50:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info c/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- Muhammad (talk) 10:50, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- hic sunt caniculi :-) Kleuske (talk) 16:40, 5 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support – SteveStrummer (talk) 08:13, 6 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support - Great picture - Dzlinker (talk) 10:21, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Request Maybe the perspective distortion could be improved ? The minarets are not vertical and it hurts me a bit ... But what a wonderful sharpness ! Very nice picture anyway --Jebulon (talk) 15:24, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support wonderfull, but please erase the dustspot left of the middle dome --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:10, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Done --Muhammad (talk) 20:46, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- MJJR (talk) 20:58, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support -- JLPC (talk) 21:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- Request No chance for a correction of the leaning minarets ?--Jebulon (talk) 15:51, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- If anybody wishes to try and upload a separate edit, no problems with me but I'm not sure I can do it right --Muhammad (talk) 16:52, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support very interesting. Tomer T (talk) 07:25, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Support did you pay 200 rupes (around 3 euros) charge (even including mobile phone) for using the camera inside this mosque? seems very strange regulation for using a camera inside that mosque.. Ggia (talk) 19:16, 10 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hehe, now the charge is 300 rupees and I was forced to pay it. It seems the money is being used to pay for the maintenance of the mosque (according to the caretaker) --Muhammad (talk) 07:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- I was really upset.. because I paid 200 rupes (last March) and then I tried to shot some scenes with video.. and some people came and told me that I have to pay another 200 rupes because I have 2 cameras!!! ;-) For example in Ahmedabad or Faterhpur Sikri there are amazing mosques with no charges.. Generally speaking inside mosques (ie. in Turkey or Iran) you don't pay money for photo or entrance fee. Ggia (talk) 08:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, there is a strong money-making trend on anything in India, which is not pleasant. Many places and monuments which were free now ask for fee. Yann (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- It pinched that I had to pay that much but if the money goes towards maintenance/restoration, I don't see anything wrong with it --Muhammad (talk) 03:38, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, there is a strong money-making trend on anything in India, which is not pleasant. Many places and monuments which were free now ask for fee. Yann (talk) 20:30, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- I was really upset.. because I paid 200 rupes (last March) and then I tried to shot some scenes with video.. and some people came and told me that I have to pay another 200 rupes because I have 2 cameras!!! ;-) For example in Ahmedabad or Faterhpur Sikri there are amazing mosques with no charges.. Generally speaking inside mosques (ie. in Turkey or Iran) you don't pay money for photo or entrance fee. Ggia (talk) 08:59, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Hehe, now the charge is 300 rupees and I was forced to pay it. It seems the money is being used to pay for the maintenance of the mosque (according to the caretaker) --Muhammad (talk) 07:44, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose The scaffolding is unfortunate. --99of9 (talk) 13:10, 11 July 2012 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective distortion, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 14:55, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
Comment A minaret high of over 40 meters from these distance without distortion (which is here not really annoying) is not realistic. The picture gives a very good impression of the proportions of this building. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:24, 12 July 2012 (UTC)
- Comment Which is here not really annoying is an opinion. Not mine. Sadly. --Jebulon (talk) 19:37, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
- Every person has his own opinion. It's absolutely not necessary to emphasize this matter of course. --Wladyslaw (talk) 19:50, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 14:37, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture