Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Horse market in Lorenzkirch.jpg

File:Horse market in Lorenzkirch.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2009 at 00:59:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Horse market in Lorenzkirch.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Horse market in Lorenzkirch.jpg

3860

38

1076

570

4948

3800

Some more restoration could be done in this area. There are still smudges visible at full res. -- JovanCormac 17:10, 12 November 2009 (UTC). - Thank You, I made the restoration. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 01:57, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

•  Info created by an unknown German photographer around 1900 - restored by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:59, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Very interesting and valuable. I'd appreciate it if you could upload an unrestored version as well for comparison. -- JovanCormac 09:06, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Info This is the unrestored version: File:Horse market in Lorenzkirch (Scan of the photography).jpg. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:37, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Comment Looking at that version, I would say you have lost some detail through the brightness correction, notably on the horses. Compared to the scan the candidate looks a little overexposed. -- JovanCormac 13:01, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support per Jovan. Mer30. Takabeg (talk) 09:09, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support GerardM (talk) 10:03, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think the contrast has been pushed too far. /Daniel78 (talk) 18:58, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Info Thanks, I made an update with lower contrast. By the way: this file is large and optimized to the resultion of 1600x1200 on the screen for the best view on the highly detailed and sharp image. It is a picture story with many freeze frames of the life in Germany 110 years ago. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:20, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
  •  Neutral The contrast is better now, but I agree that VI might be better suited so I'll go neutral. /Daniel78 (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Comment – one of Wikimedia's finest? To me it seems more like a valued image. --Ernie (talk) 23:33, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose. I think it is more a valued image than a featured one too. It's very difficult to make out anything as it's so far away, it's also very ugly and I don't like the glare. I'm also not sure the house is correct perspective-wise but I could be wrong there. --Silversmith Hewwo 07:33, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Not thrilling at first look, but very good in full size. Quality adequate to its age --Jklamo (talk) 20:15, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /99of9 (talk) 20:58, 20 November 2009 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical