Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 26 - Garnrollen.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Haslach an der Mühl - Textiles Zentrum Haslach - 26 - Garnrollen.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2016 at 13:16:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created & uploaded by User:Haeferl - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
Support - Something different. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:16, 8 November 2016 (UTC)- Support Nice composition. --Smial (talk) 16:15, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support Cools spools. --cart-Talk 16:41, 8 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support lNeverCry 08:12, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support Good idea, good picture.--Ermell (talk) 21:47, 9 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support Processing is a little ragged, but on the whole it works. Daniel Case (talk) 05:07, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Comment - Daniel, thanks for your vote and comment. For my edification, how is the processing ragged? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:55, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: On further viewing, it does seem a little too sharpened (see slight halos around the spools and every finely outlined object within the DoF). Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment - Yes, I am seeing some of that. User:Haeferl, would you like to edit the photo to address these observations? (Entschuldingung dass ich weiss nicht wie mann kann "halos" usw. auf Deutsch sagen.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:43, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for your vote and your review, Daniel, but "a little too sharpened" cannot be, because the picture is not at all sharpened. May be, some fibrous yarns in combination with the lights make this effect. I don't know, what to do, Ikan, I made only perspective correction. Nice greetings, --Häferl (talk) 22:44, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I like the photo, regardless. Perhaps someone has a suggestion; otherwise, if you do nothing, that's OK with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- There are some sharpening artifacts, yes, but not more than in many (or most) other FP and not really disturbing in 100% view. --smial 10:47, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I like the photo, regardless. Perhaps someone has a suggestion; otherwise, if you do nothing, that's OK with me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:35, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: On further viewing, it does seem a little too sharpened (see slight halos around the spools and every finely outlined object within the DoF). Daniel Case (talk) 20:02, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
- Support Jee 08:42, 13 November 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects
