Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gorilla gorilla gorilla, London Zoo (1).jpg

File:Gorilla gorilla gorilla, London Zoo (1).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2012 at 12:57:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Gorilla gorilla gorilla, London Zoo (1).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gorilla gorilla gorilla, London Zoo (1).jpg

•  Info created by William Warby - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 12:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 12:57, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Neutral zoo shot, not convinced the composition is FP given the location. too low in the image, looking away from camera Gnangarra 13:09, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose good composition, but the blurry plants in the foreground, blurring its body, spoil it. Tomer T (talk) 13:38, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Weak support weak because of some areas focus/ definition.--Telemaque MySon (talk) 17:12, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support Was striking enough for me to open full res. Wide open yields shallow DOF but also an attractive "bokeh" imo. It's also sharp where it matters, and I don't think we'll miss each hair being in focus. I don't find the zoo issue to affect the pic this much. Composition is trivial, but there's not a thousand way to take gorillas, and this serves encyclopedic purpose well (which may be main use of that picture). - Benh (talk) 22:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support per Benh. Jkadavoor (talk) 04:58, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Support --Paolo Costa (talk) 07:04, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose The ropes spoil it for me, I would prefer an all-"natural" scene. --99of9 (talk) 04:41, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:28, 4 May 2012 (UTC)