Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Girl August 2008-1.jpg

File:Girl August 2008-1.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Oct 2010 at 11:10:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Girl August 2008-1.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Girl August 2008-1.jpg

•  Info Portrait of a girl. Everything by Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:10, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Pretty average snapshot of an average object with an average quality. Masur (talk) 15:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
  • People aren't objects. --IdLoveOne (talk) 22:43, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Masur--MASHAUNIX 20:12, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose not good enough imo. Athyllis (talk) 21:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support What can I say? She's charming. Not high res but there is real quality here. (my error, good res) Stellarkid (talk) 15:51, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose --Brackenheim (talk) 20:06, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Comment please state reason for opposition as a courtesy to the author/uploader. Lycaon (talk) 13:18, 19 October 2010 (UTC)

•  Oppose in general a nice portrait. But I don't like the centered composition so much. Maybe also a upright photo might have been better in this case. --AngMoKio (talk) 08:10, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj (talk) 18:50, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support It's a good quality photo of some random little girl, basically. --IdLoveOne (talk) 22:42, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment Random ? I suspect that this (very pretty) young girl is well known in pictures by some "Commons users" (not her first appearance), and very well known especially but one of us here, if I'm not wrong... And the shirt is already (a bit) overexposed, IMO.--Jebulon (talk) 15:12, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Lycaon (talk) 17:18, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I think this image of a minor should be kept as a private family snapshot unless permission has been given by herself and her parents. Apparently anonymous girl according to image description. Snowmanradio (talk) 19:52, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose There doesn't seem to be anything special about this picture, other than a plain portrait of an anonymous girl that (from what I know) is not a public figure. LeavXC (talk) 22:08, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--Miguel Bugallo 20:57, 22 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Very good portrait of a beautiful girl, but for the next portrait I would have tried to put her directly against the sun because now half of her face seems to be in a shadow.--Mbz1 (talk) 23:42, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Cephas (talk) 01:01, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:17, 25 October 2010 (UTC)