Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 07-09 HDR.JPG

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Fuente Wittelsbacher, Plaza Lenbach, Múnich, Alemania, 2015-07-04, DD 07-09 HDR.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2015 at 19:26:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

The Wittelsbacher foutain is a monumental fountain at the north border of Munich downtown (Germany). The fountain was built between 1893 and 1895 following drawings of the sculptor Adolf von Hildebrand. The subject of the 25-long-basin is the forces of the water element with the allegory of the destruction on the left hand and of the blessing force on the right.
  • Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
  •  Info The Wittelsbacher foutain is a monumental fountain at the north border of Munich downtown (Germany). The fountain was built between 1893 and 1895 following drawings of the sculptor Adolf von Hildebrand. The subject of the 25-long-basin is the forces of the water element with the allegory of the destruction on the left hand and of the blessing force on the right. All by me, Poco2 19:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Poco2 19:26, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:35, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support very good, maybe a little tight. According to the title it's an HDR image that we have here, though EXIF metadata doesn't corroborate that...(?) Btw, impressive new equipment, Diego! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:59, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi Martin! It looks like when using HDR in LR6 the EXIF data of one of the result is taken over from one of the frames, will look into that. Regarding the equipment, yes, it's a different and bigger animal that I am trying to domesticate :) Poco2 21:57, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Oppose WB is off. Seems like you were chasing lights but you spoiled the sky, despite you didnt catch correct temperature or light (bottom part still too much yellow and sky too fluorescent). What should be benefit of HDR here, its more way around - sky should be darker with different looking. Composition doesnt work for me neither, if back would be darker would be better. --Mile (talk) 06:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    I don't know what you mean by chasing lights. I didn't touch the WB, I rarely have to do that. The colors look pretty loyal to reality to me, but I can reduce saturation a bit. Benefit if HDR is to capture the high dynamic range of the scene. Maybe it doesn't stand out to you but with one frame I'd either have a lot of overexposed areas or a lot of underexposed areas, and that is IMHO an issue that I adressed with HDR. Composition is a matter of taste. To me the fountain is for itself a highlight (to me without doubt the nicest in Munich), the smooth water and night lighting increases the wow and the blue sky rounds it. Poco2 15:58, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support -- Pofka (talk) 08:32, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Congratulations on the new camera （＾＾）_∠※:♪:*｡・♫.ﾟ★.♪*｡☆・ﾟ･♬.:.* --Laitche (talk) 08:51, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The two moving girls are a pity. There is too much noise in the trees at left IMO. I'm not sure HDR is useful here. But... I like this appealing picture.--Jebulon (talk) 09:18, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Very good, but the criticism has a base. --Tremonist (talk) 12:47, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mile, Jebulon, Tremonist: ✓ new version with reduced saturation of the sky and reduced noise in the trees on the left Poco2 19:25, 7 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment I saw it but its not that. I think HDR shouldnt be used in such case. Eyes should stick on fountain imidiately, not on sky and trees or somewhere in the middle. In would aim camera lower for that reason, less sky, more concrete bellow fountain. --Mile (talk) 06:41, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment It's all very beautifull -- with the sole exception of the two blurred persons on the right. It indicates motion, of course, but motion that is hardly needed here. Unfortunately, I don't see any option for a good crop here in order to fix this problem. --Tremonist (talk) 12:20, 8 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral Great photo, but distracting people. — Julian H.✈ 07:30, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Neutral. Yes I agree with Julian, the people are distracting and enough to make it hard to support. Again, congrats on the new camera and lens though. Seems to be pretty sharp. I'm not yet convinced to buy the 5Ds though. I'm not really impressed with the sensor performance figures and I'm wishing for better dynamic range and ISO performance than megapixels (stitching is enough to provide me with megapixels when I need it). Diliff (talk) 14:13, 10 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  •  I withdraw my nomination Btw, believe me guys, I wouldn't change this camera for two 5D Mark IIs... Poco2 19:25, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • I wouldn't suggest you would.. But I'd rather a Nikon D810 or Sony A7Rii, personally. If I wasn't already so heavily invested in Canon lenses that is! The dynamic range advantage is more important than megapixels IMO. Diliff (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Fuente_Wittelsbacher,_Plaza_Lenbach,_Múnich,_Alemania,_2015-07-04,_DD_07-09_HDR.JPG&oldid=165644692"