Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fraxern 06.JPG
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Fraxern, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2010 at 21:30:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info all by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:30, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:30, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Patriot8790 (talk) 19:11, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Simonizer (talk) 22:21, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support ■ MMXX talk 23:50, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Beautifully image. - Verwende bitte Bildnamen ohne private Zusätze wie 06. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support Nice with the framing of the tree.--Korall (talk) 23:54, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I thought about it a long time, but the composition does not quite convince me. IMO the path visible to the right side of the image is spoiling it. It´s a good atmospheric image, but for me not outstanding enough for FP, sorry. Nikopol (talk) 12:44, 20 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose The tree, instead of keeping the composition together, obscures the quite nice view. CA on the tree. --Leafnode✉ 19:44, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose for composition reasons. The tree is too dominant in the composition. Especially the thin branch partly obstructing the view is distracting IMO. Sorry. --Slaunger (talk) 21:11, 21 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Slaunger I'm afraid --Herby talk thyme 09:31, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Albertus teolog (talk) 23:08, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Aktron (talk) 10:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Slaunger. The part where the branch "touches" the forest in the background spoils the composition. --Pjt56 (talk) 09:35, 24 January 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 08:10, 27 January 2010 (UTC)