Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Frankfurt Am Main-Main Plaza-Ansicht von der Ignatz-Bubis-Bruecke.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Frankfurt Am Main-Main Plaza-Ansicht von der Ignatz-Bubis-Bruecke.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2010 at 06:55:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Mylius - uploaded by Mylius - nominated by Mylius -- Mylius (talk) 07:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)- Info Main Plaza in Frankfurt on the Main, a 88 meter highrise citing the style of the 1920's, finished in 2001 according to plans of Hans Kollhoff
Support -- Mylius (talk) 07:00, 4 August 2010 (UTC)- Support -- nice lighting. --Elekhh (talk) 08:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:59, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very fine. --MAURILBERT (discuter) 13:12, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support Great shot. -- Sdgjake (talk) 15:04, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
Oppose - overdone perspective correction in tower, with parallel sides make it 'look' wider at the top than lower down (because the brain expects it to show smaller angular diameter higher up), and disturbing green glow under bridge - MPF (talk) 15:31, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Actually very little perspective correction was done on this particular image (here's the unprocessed original from RAW), I rather guess the one expecting a smaller angular diameter is you as this building's top is quite unusual. As for the light, this can't be avoided in situations where lighting from sources with a highly dissimilar colour temperature mix (here: blue hour natural and artifical) --Mylius (talk) 20:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Try re-taking the pic at a different time of day, when the artifical lights are off? That would likely give better light on the building, too. - MPF (talk) 13:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Actually very little perspective correction was done on this particular image (here's the unprocessed original from RAW), I rather guess the one expecting a smaller angular diameter is you as this building's top is quite unusual. As for the light, this can't be avoided in situations where lighting from sources with a highly dissimilar colour temperature mix (here: blue hour natural and artifical) --Mylius (talk) 20:24, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support Good picture. No perspective issues IMO. -- MJJR (talk) 21:48, 4 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support I like the foto, the lighting and the overall perspective. No problems here. --Korman (talk) 05:34, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically very good, but no wow and boring composition. --Taraxacum (talk) 09:02, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Taraxacum. --99of9 (talk) 13:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose per Taraxacum and 99of9 --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:24, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Υπέρ --патриот8790Say whatever you want 19:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose As Taraxacum. --Mile (talk) 20:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support Very good shot of an architectural interesting tower in the evening light. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support Technically good, we need more pictures of architecture for the wikis and it is a problem that it's so difficult to promote one here. We have very fine details here and no technical problems. It would not get more useful using an extreme angle or lighting in order to receive a wow-effect... --Mbdortmund (talk) 09:47, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
Comment A piece of media does not need to be assessed as Featured to be used widely in Wikimedia projects. Need in Wikipedia or elsewhere has zero bearing on whether or not we think something meets the Featured criteria or not. Steven Walling 22:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose I dislike the composition (cropped out background/foreground elements leave a strange, angular frame) and simply do not think it's the best of the best on Commons. I would suggest a QI nomination. Steven Walling 22:18, 6 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose - It's interesting, and while it is a good photo with technically correct perspective, it doesn't "feel" quite right. Perhaps it's the composition. Try a bit different angle, or less centered subject? Jonathunder (talk) 13:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 02:57, 8 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support --mathias K 10:07, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support Cathy Richards (talk) 14:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik (my contribs) 17:35, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:44, 12 August 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 15 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 15:14, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture
