Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Four Samsung laser toner cartridges front view.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Four Samsung laser toner cartridges front view.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Aug 2016 at 22:06:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info I was playing around with one because of the green roll, but when I found three more I could not resist... All by me -- w.carter-Talk 22:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Support- Mild
Oppose - I understand that you like this kind of image. We'll see what others think, but while I respect your sensibilities, in this case I don't share them, because this is just a stack and doesn't otherwise help my eyes move around the picture frame, so I therefore don't find it interesting to look it, beyond a very casual surface level. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:17, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, not all things are great vistas or castles that you can just enjoy, some things are just things (like this FP and similar) that you take a picure of and try to make the most of it. Photos of flowers taken in this manner are easy to like, but I can understand that toner cartridges are a bit harder to get excited about. w.carter-Talk 14:39, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- That FP is a significantly more interesting composition to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:15, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose This might be better if it was more abstract (no brown border, to begin with). As it is, it looks like some kind of product shot. INeverCry 19:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks, very useful comment! I thought the brown set of the green rather nicely, but it never hurts to think differently. Can't reshoot it since it has all gone to the recycling station now, but just for fun I tried out an alt version. Not really seeing this go very far after initial reaction though. w.carter-Talk 21:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Alt version
- Info Version thanks to INC's comment. --w.carter-Talk 21:30, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support moved from first version. --w.carter-Talk 09:36, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- The colors are already more complimentary here, but I was imagining something where there's no border or where the square format was done away with altogether. But that's neither here nor there if you can't re-shoot and play around with shapes. INeverCry 22:34, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support A little unsharp on the light reflections but the image is striking enough that I don't care. Someone decided to do something different, take a risk, and it worked. Does anyone else think they look like shaver cartridges? That's what I thought they were at first. Daniel Case (talk) 03:37, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support per Daniel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:42, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:27, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:07, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support --Ralf Roleček 21:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support And 7 for the Gillette cartridges...
INeverCry 23:55, 6 August 2016 (UTC) - Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry to spoil, but I do not really see a FP here. Wow is limited, quality okay, but not exceptional, composition also rather unspectacular. --DXR (talk) 08:32, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose - I have to admit, I agree with DXR. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:51, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Per DXR. Also, I don't really like the lighting: highlights on the left and right plus a darker band in the centre. --El Grafo (talk) 16:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose A stack of object, without Wow effect --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose As above, no wow. --Karelj (talk) 16:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose As above -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
