Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fossil Bay Seascape 2.jpg

File:Fossil Bay Seascape 2.jpg, featured

Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2009 at 02:01:54

•  Info created by Noodle snacks - uploaded by Noodle snacks - nominated by Noodle snacks -- Noodle snacks (talk) 02:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Same place as one last week. Different angle. The stuff in the foreground is Macrocystis pyrifera which can grow at up to 60cm per day. -- Noodle snacks (talk) 02:01, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad quality, nothing special.--Two+two=4 (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2009 (UTC)
  • Probably a sock: Special:Contributions/Two+two=4. Noodle snacks (talk) 22:43, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

What a nice welcome!--Two+two=4 (talk) 03:38, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Comment I think you might be jumping to conclusions a little fast there Noodle. Everyone has to start somewhere. I began my own stay on Commons by reviewing interesting pictures people had nominated, if you remember, yet I wasn't assumed to be sockpuppet. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:54, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
  • I'll wait until I get home to my own monitor before I review your picture; the monitors here at work are horrible. Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 09:58, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

• • • Probability of creating a userpage as a first edit is low, especially considering no edits on other wikis. I'd be jumping to conclusions if I said the user was a sock, rather than probably one. Noodle snacks (talk) 02:34, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
      • What a silly assumption! Only one example: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&dir=prev&target=Lviatour --Two+two=4 (talk) 18:40, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
        • Not a valid counter example: http://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sp%C3%A9cial:Contributions&dir=prev&target=Lviatour. I'm only claiming that you should be treated with suspicion, rather than you are a sock puppet. Noodle snacks (talk) 00:17, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

I'm not going to loose my time to look for more examples and I pardon the silly suspicion of yours. I know you are upset I opposed your image.--Two+two=4 (talk) 02:35, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

•  Support I like it - good lighting and composition. Time3000 (talk) 10:57, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support Looking well. --Karel (talk) 21:32, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, quite good. --Vprisivko (talk) 18:57, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 08:01, 2 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Neutral - colors are too artificial Downtowngal (talk) 00:31, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Real colors are real. Noodle snacks (talk) 02:24, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
•  Support, Tintero (talk) 19:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC) - not valid vote - after voting period

result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral =>  featured. --Karel (talk) 20:47, 6 August 2009 (UTC)