Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Forte de Copacabana 10.jpg

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Forte de Copacabana 10.jpg

[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jan 2015 at 15:14:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

View to the Guanabara Bay from the Fort Copacabana, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Alternative

[edit]

  • ArionEstar I re-cropped the image, you can see that you eyes goes directly to the ruins(?) and the horizontal line is not more close to the middle of the photo, giving a more interesting look to the photo; the sky did not have anything to add. Now I'm looking the perspective have some horizontal problem latter a fix... -- RTA 21:42, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Hubertl: please, explain why? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:00, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    • With this crop, the complete atmosphere gets lost. Right now its a cliff, a wave and some water. If the photographer wanted to take this sector of the landscape, he would have done it. Cropping or changing pictures of other without asking them is like adopting a child without information to the real parents. Make your own pictures and nominate it (the same for Rodrigo.Argento) or get in close contact before you nominate any pictures of others! Don´t play the copycat, its serious a question of respect! I am postprocessing pictures from others very often, but only, because User explicitely asked me or I asked them before by mail. I never did it, until I got an answer! The next problem is, that this picture is not just cropped, it has more changes. You can´t do this for FP without using the original file, which was maybe RAW! This seem to me a complete lack of understanding the quality process. I do not want ever, that someone use an picture of mine I uploaded to nominate it for any assessing, until he will ask me for the original RAW-file. I hope you both understand, that the multiple compressing of a compressed picture makes it even worth with every new version. --Hubertl (talk) 13:20, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      • @Hubertl: What I do here is to help nominate the pictures. I think I'm working. From the beginning when I opened my account here in Commoms (end of 2013) to today, I nominated approximately 25 images that have become FP. See my discussion page. I'm helping The Photographer to nominate the pictures that he uploads in Commons. Then, I think I'm doing a good work here.😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:35, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        • @ArionEstar: This is a perfect result! What we should do more is, to encourage people to get into this assessment processes. The result is, that many of them will get more conciousness about their own pre-selectings. But always with tender contact, especially to work with the original files. This will raise the quality in different ways. --Hubertl (talk) 14:52, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hubertl: What are saying is total bullshit! First of all, this is a image under a free license, so modifications are necessary allowed, second it's a free community and we can, and we are encourage to nominate third-party image to FP process. In fact, in my case I prefer in that way. You can not prohibit the use of your images, or forbid modify by any how. If you do not get that until now, sorry, you are in wrong community. Just a observation, RAW files, all of them are under a non free format, saying that to modify a photo a I need a proprietary software invalidates the free license, that's way we do not allow this type of file here. And I will not enter in your problem again: not know how to listening to people; you can stop learning, ignoring knowledge, but this is a community based on spread the knowledge and I will keep saying what's wrong with your photos. V -- RTA 16:02, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you will write all this in a comprehensive form without any personal attacks, I will answer you. You can write it in spanish, if its easier for you, but stay polite.--Hubertl (talk) 16:50, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Ad hominem... nice argument. Three observations I'm a f Brazilian, so I do not speak Spanish. Nothing in my text is a "personal attack", it's true, "blackmail" people just because I modify some aspect of the photo is a "personal attack". And this is 2015, if you can not handle harsh words, back in time seignior. -- RTA 23:17, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Forte_de_Copacabana_10.jpg&oldid=148472284"