Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Encephalartos sclavoi reproductive cone.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Encephalartos sclavoi reproductive cone.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2010 at 20:12:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Info An endangered species. Very high resolution image. C/u/n by Muhammad Mahdi Karim -- Muhammad (talk) 20:12, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support -- Muhammad (talk) 20:12, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support That is one big reproductive cone. Steven Walling 22:39, 29 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - lacking location information - MPF (talk) 00:16, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Done Added --Muhammad (talk) 10:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks; but "Pictured in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania" - is that a wild specimen in a reserve, or a cultivated plant in a garden (in which case, has the identity been independently verified? - mis-identifications are rife in garden collections!), or what? - MPF (talk) 22:33, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Done Added --Muhammad (talk) 10:32, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 00:56, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support This is a very nice picture to critique. It has many elements: educational value, good photographic technique and aesthetic value. The educational value we leave to the botanists. Photographically it has good general technique, good color, texture, rythm, volume that gives off a good visual experience (this is where you can tell intuitively it is a good picture), and aesthetically speaking, well, it is just so good... bordering on the erotic. --Tomascastelazo (talk) 04:42, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:01, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment - Why such a large size? I can't see any fine details justifying it. Also, the crop is too tight. It would be nice to see some whole leaves and (perhaps) the branch were the cone is attached to. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 07:46, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Comment Very nice image, but I agree with Alvesgaspar about crop, it's too tight. also why "GFDL 1.2 only"? ■ MMXX talk 22:30, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support - nice. Jonathunder (talk) 22:48, 30 April 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 15:27, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Enzik (talk) 21:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 05:48, 9 May 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants