Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eesti Lennundusmuuseum. Hävitaja F-4C Phantom II kabiin.jpg

File:Eesti Lennundusmuuseum. Hävitaja F-4C Phantom II kabiin.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2022 at 06:53:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Eesti Lennundusmuuseum. Hävitaja F-4C Phantom II kabiin.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Eesti Lennundusmuuseum. Hävitaja F-4C Phantom II kabiin.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
•  Info created & uploaded by Lauri Veerde - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 06:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 06:53, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Excellent. Are there more? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:02, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:19, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Well done. As a big F-4 Phantom fan who has seen thousands of photos of this aircraft, I have never seen such a sharp and informative view of the cockpit before. -- IamMM (talk) 07:50, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support per IamMM. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Strong support Amazing 360° immersion -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:14, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support - Very effective. @Veerdelauri: Would you share what equipment you use to make these? I see the EXIF is missing, so I can't tell if it's a 360 camera or stitching. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  13:37, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

• One can safely assume this is not a 360° cam which would surely shows with many stitching errors / seams, and a weird pattern where the void / stick is. - Benh (talk) 08:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)

He has previosly told, that he uses Sony A7R III, Canon 8-15mm f/4 fisheye lens & Nodal Ninja panoramic head. He usually shoots at 13mm in 6 directions + one down. Standard is 3 images in each position (+-2 EV) and so in total one panorama image consists of 21 photos. For post-processing he uses Lightroom, Ptgui, SNS-HDR, Photmatix, Aurora HDR, Photoshop, Topaz Labs plug-in’s or whatever is needed. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:53, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

• Thank you for the insights, Kruusamägi! --Aristeas (talk) 05:19, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

•  Strong support So cool! — Urban Versis 32^KB ⚡ ^{(talk | contribs)} 14:04, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:16, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ermell (talk) 21:55, 25 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support very skillful shooting and stitching and amazing to look at - Benh (talk) 08:03, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Ivar (talk) 18:57, 26 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 06:21, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:33, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support finally took a look Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:29, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:34, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Mosbatho (talk) 14:56, 28 July 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft