Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dundus Square.jpg

File:Dundus Square.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jan 2011 at 19:52:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dundus Square.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dundus Square.jpg

•  Info Dundas Square in Downtown Toronto. Created by Pedro Szekely - uploaded by Marmoulak - nominated by Marmoulak
•  Support -- Marmoulak (talk) 19:52, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support: Wow.--Garrondo (talk) 19:56, 26 December 2010 (UTC)

• The color, the composition, the sensations it produces in my, the feeling of being there. I simply like it.--Garrondo (talk) 08:39, 27 December 2010 (UTC)

• •  Comment Wow what? --MAURILBERT (discuter) 04:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Really nasty distortion and tilt. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:09, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Sorry, oversaturated flickr kitsch -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:01, 26 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Seriously... --MAURILBERT (discuter) 04:09, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Flickr kitsch --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:16, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Garrando, I would like being there, but sadly I don´t vote on pictures based on that. This image is tilted and disorted, per THFSW.--Snaevar (talk) 11:51, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose It is cool but I think it looks to high to be a FP. --Aktron (talk) 12:58, 27 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I agree with Alvesgaspar and The High Fin Sperm Whale--Miguel Bugallo 11:41, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support FWIW. I stayed away from this 'cause I couldn't decide at first if it was a photo or a digital painting, but I think I agree with Garrondo. I find it kind of artistic. It's possible it could be run through GIMP and have the perspective corrected, but it probably would ruin the looking-up effect. --IdLoveOne (talk) 23:59, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose I really like the perspective. It's perfect for this kind of image. But it isn't sharp enough and the colors are ugly, especially the black parts (wrong colors) inside the signs. --Niabot (talk) 19:59, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose. No, sorry, the list of postprocessing operations reads like a self-satire: Imagenomic Noiseware twice, one stronger on the sky. For the next commands I masked the sky. - Smart sharpen - Freaky details masking - Nik Tonal Contrast - Vibrance increase on the whole image - A bit os saturation boost on the sky - Curves - Burn the top of the sky and the edges. The result is typical Flickr Kitsch. --Dschwen (talk) 17:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
•  Support great composition Bunnyfrosch (talk) 23:05, 2 January 2011 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:51, 5 January 2011 (UTC)