Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa)-3 new.jpg

File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa)-3 new.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2014 at 00:47:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa)-3 new.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa)-3 new.jpg

2410

130

519

403

3072

2048

dust spots

•  Info created by Dean Franklin - uploaded by Papa Lima Whiskey - nominated by Arion -- ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 00:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 00:47, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Good quality, high value. Yann (talk) 07:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
  • I support the alternative instead. Yann (talk) 19:17, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:10, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 21:05, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Michael Barera (talk) 22:17, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:00, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy sky (not sure it is an original...), and at least two dust spots.--Jebulon (talk) 10:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Just saying no to the black coloured pines. A clear indication this is underexposed. Saffron Blaze (talk) 18:09, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose per Saffron. Lewis Hulbert (talk) 20:38, 23 April 2014 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Info Alternative version. ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 18:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 18:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Even better. Yann (talk) 04:21, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Comment Yes, much better, but why the reduction in image size? Saffron Blaze (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

@Saffron Blaze:  Done. Also wanted to know. ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 13:40, 21 April 2014 (UTC)

•  Support better! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:59, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Very nice. Compares well with some of the finer takes on this scene I could find on the internet. Saffron Blaze (talk) 13:54, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Baresi F (talk) 21:23, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support That's better. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 20:37, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
•  Support Poco² 19:29, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Jee 12:17, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

The chosen alternative is: File:Dean Franklin - 06.04.03 Mount Rushmore Monument (by-sa).jpg

•  Comment @Jee: The category is Objects? Why? Places would be better? Or not? ArionEstar (talk) from Google Translate. 12:23, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

• I spent some time to understand the subject. Mount Rushmore says "The Mount Rushmore National Memorial is a sculpture carved into the granite face of Mount Rushmore." So it is an object if it is a sculpture; it is a place if it the mountain. Any way I don't want it to place under "natural" is it is not very natural now. Any other editor can change the category if he prefer/think so. :) Jee 12:50, 26 April 2014 (UTC)