Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Danaerys.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Daenerys.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2019 at 16:05:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Vathanna - uploaded by User:e.3 - nominated by E.3 -- E.3 (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Support -- E.3 (talk) 16:05, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Request Please fix the author information in this nomination (Deviantart never creates anything) and the link to deviantart.com on the file page is broken. – Lucas 16:23, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Comment it looks like it was taken down by the artist, a reverse image search doesn't reveal it. But as we can see it was published by Vathanna under the correct license in January. --E.3 (talk) 16:33, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
Oppose This has only 0.8 MP, far below the minimum of 2 MP per the guidelines and there are no strong mitigating reasons. I'm loosely familiar with fanart and this doesn't seem special at all. – Lucas 17:07, 31 May 2019 (UTC)- Oppose Low resolution -- Piotr Bart (talk) 18:28, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
 |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Too far below the 2Mpx minimum size and there are no strong mitigating reasons. Please read the rules at COM:FPC more carefully before the next nomination. --Cart (talk) 17:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
- Comment Cart, just to be correct and you likely know this already: when there are "strong mitigating reasons" the 2 MP minimum can be ignored so it should be mentioned in a FPX reason that the nom fails both aspects. – Lucas 20:35, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
- Yes I know, but since you had already mentioned it above, I didn't think there was any reason to bring it up again. To keep things formal per your recommendation, I've added it now. It is now mentioned three times in the nom; a bit of overkill IMO. If you think a text in an FPX template is inadequate, please feel free to substitute it with a text of your own. Improving how this forum works is never wrong. --Cart (talk) 21:10, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
