Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dürnstein Panorama 01.JPG

File:Dürnstein Panorama 01.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2014 at 07:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Dürnstein Panorama 01.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dürnstein Panorama 01.JPG

•  Info created by Uoaei1 - uploaded by Uoaei1 - nominated by Uoaei1 -- Uoaei1 (talk) 07:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
•  Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 07:22, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Dramatic lighting, nice composition. A bit on the soft side though, and whites are slightly burnt. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:33, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice indeed but also unsharp, maybe improvable with a little sharpening and a downdsampling to 3800 or 4000px but not sure. In more for informations, the right is leaning in and there is a dustspot in the middle of the sky. And to avoid the overexposition you made an edit a bit dark and not enough contrasted IMO. I made on my pc all what I said and I can upload an alternative if you want -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 07:44, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

 Info New version uploaded, according comments by User:Christian Ferrer. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:36, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Yes but as said by Ivar the noise reduction is too strong at full resolution. IMO here the only solution to avoid the noise or/and the noise reduction issues is a big downsampling. And even with a big downsampling you should put down a bit the NR. -- Christian Ferrer ^Talk 16:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

•  Comment Imho NR is a bit too strong. --Ivar (talk) 10:10, 1 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Denoising TOO strong. You lost all detail. --Kadellar (talk) 14:16, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Neutral Great motif but technical quality is not convincing. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 20:08, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Very nice pic but unfortunately unsharp; can't imagine noise reduction is the problem (with ISO 160 on a D7100?), I think this lens is just unable to cope with the resolution of the camera. --P e z i (talk) 10:51, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice subject, composition ok (probably better showing more of the right side but under those lighting conditions that would be a problem), but poor quality with considerable lack of detail (e.g. the ruins in the top). Poco² 15:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 16:50, 9 June 2014 (UTC)