Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cygnus atratus (Latham, 1790).jpg

File:Cygnus atratus (Latham, 1790).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2010 at 13:53:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cygnus atratus (Latham, 1790).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cygnus atratus (Latham, 1790).jpg

•  Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:53, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

•  Neutral change vote A really nice pic where I really like the light. But the crop and the resolution aren't perfect. I've uploaded a croped version of yours, but now the res is way below 2mpix. But if you like it maybe you reupload the picture with a crop like this and a higher res. Then I will support. bg mathias K 15:19, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Info Thank you, mathias K, I made the new crop like yours. You see it above. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:58, 24 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Question Why was the original image downsampled? Please can you upload full-resolution versions of all your featured pictures? They would be a great asset to the users. --99of9 (talk) 00:30, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
• now  Support thanks for the crop and rising the resolution! bg mathias K 06:12, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Good colours but too little detail for the tiny size of the image (only just above minimum). Lycaon (talk) 14:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose - good, but not the best Cygnus atratus photo on commons - MPF (talk) 14:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Support--MZaplotnik ^{(my contribs)} 05:29, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not quite visually striking enough. --99of9 (talk) 22:43, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:57, 4 July 2010 (UTC)