Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crown of Thorns Starfish at Malapascuas Island.jpg

File:Crown of Thorns Starfish at Malapascuas Island.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Mar 2015 at 17:43:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Crown of Thorns Starfish at Malapascuas Island.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crown of Thorns Starfish at Malapascuas Island.jpg

•  Info created by Matt Kieffer - uploaded by Unbuttered Parsnip - nominated by Archaeodontosaurus -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Exceptional images may sometimes not be of extremely high quality. Here's a rare sea star, which we know only a few specimens reassembled by trawlers. This is the first time it was photographed in its natural environment. We are fortunate that this image is poured into COMMONS. Thanks to the work of Wikipedians that encourage underwater photographers to submit their images. They deserve our gratitude.-- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:43, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Unique picture of an extremely rare animal, with satisfactory technical quality (all the more given the conditions of light and depth), and beautiful aesthetics. Such pictures are precious treasures for Wiki projects. FredD (talk) 17:58, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support It falls short on technical side. How sad it was shot with a Sony DSC-TX7... but I'm convinced by the explanations of Archaeodontosaurus. - Benh (talk) 18:18, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Support anyway, rare stuff, with Plasma all over ? --Mile (talk) 18:22, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Also it has beautiful colors. And I also support the Mile's version. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:25, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Strong support I totally agree with the nominator. Outstanding and unique educational and scientific value. As FredD said Such pictures are precious treasures for Wiki projects. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:42, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:56, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Wrong white balance, easily corrected. Yann (talk) 10:00, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --PIERRE ANDRE LECLERCQ (talk) 15:27, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support ----Hafspajen 16:03, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I support the other, better WB. --Kadellar (talk) 13:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Alternative version

•  Comment worth to save...could you see if this one is better, green level lowered. --Mile (talk) 18:21, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I also support the Mile's version. @Yann: It's better? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:11, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Better. Yann (talk) 13:53, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 14:25, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I think this one is more natural. --Mile (talk) 17:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:28, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Baresi F (talk) 23:24, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Quality is not that good, but value is important here. --Kadellar (talk) 13:20, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals

The chosen alternative is: File:Crown of Thorns Starfish at Malapascuas Island v. II.jpg