Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Croisillon sud de la basilique Saint-Sauveur, Dinan, France.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Croisillon sud de la basilique Saint-Sauveur, Dinan, France.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2013 at 22:18:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by EdouardHue - uploaded by EdouardHue - nominated by EdouardHue -- EdouardHue (talk) 22:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Support -- EdouardHue (talk) 22:18, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Too harsh contrast between highlights (blown parts of the window) and shadows, try HDR. --A.Savin 20:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- I'm not found of HDR pictures (looks unnatural to me), I don't really want to try it. One of the points of this picture is to show the contrast that does exist between the sun-bathed tainted glass that illuminate the retable and the parts of the church that remain in the shadow. IMHO, it would be a distortion of reality to make an equally exposed picture. --EdouardHue (talk) 20:33, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose While the objective may be to show the contrast between the illuminated parts and the shadow, there should really be some detail in the shadow areas and I doubt anyone would suggest the whole image be equally exposed, I certainly would not. More importantly most of the stained glass window highlights are blown out and ruin the image even if you accept the high contrast. Ww2censor (talk) 21:17, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
- Here is a new version with more details in the shadow - they come at the cost of some noise in the lower right corner, albeit stronger noise reduction. Can't do much for the highlights though, as it was a sunny white sky outside. --EdouardHue (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Unfortunately for me the window highlights are still a major problem even though the shadow detail has improved a little. Ww2censor (talk) 08:18, 3 April 2013 (UTC)
- Here is a new version with more details in the shadow - they come at the cost of some noise in the lower right corner, albeit stronger noise reduction. Can't do much for the highlights though, as it was a sunny white sky outside. --EdouardHue (talk) 20:51, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 19:05, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose as Ww2censor -- Arcalino (talk) 10:57, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose by A. Savin. HDR had produced a much better result. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:54, 6 April 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
