Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cranes made by Origami paper.jpg

File:Cranes made by Origami paper.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2015 at 01:15:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Cranes made by Origami paper.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cranes made by Origami paper.jpg

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
•  Info created by Laitche - uploaded by Laitche - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 01:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pine^✉ 01:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Ximonic (talk) 03:29, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Laitche (talk) 07:34, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Info This is re-processing from raw version with Lightroom 5.0 since I did a bit wrong color adjustment with former version, in this version posterization is fixed as well. The altitude of the sun at 18 December 2007, 15:29:35 (JST) was 12.72°, actually background is white but they can see the long shadows by sunlight. I think this is the third nominations (formar nomination). --Laitche (talk) 08:41, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --XRay ^talk 10:45, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support I don't know why but this remember me Ranma ½ --LivioAndronico talk 11:47, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Hahaha, it might be similar Japanese feeling. --Laitche (talk) 11:52, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

•  Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:56, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support A good and representative image. I love Japanese culture. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:09, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:48, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:21, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Nice. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:20, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:31, 5 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral Nice subject and composition but the DoF seems insufficient to me. The right wing of the red bird is completely out of focus. And then the shadow is a little bit disturbing. Not bad enough to oppose but not good enough to support as well. --Code (talk) 04:15, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support Albertus teolog (talk) 17:09, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Not really... --Tomascastelazo (talk) 17:31, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Code + the shadows and especially the red reflection just don't do it for me.--Fotoriety (talk) 23:27, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Code. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:58, 7 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment @Code: Sorry for late reply, it's a macro shot and the subject is very small and used 90mm prime macro lens with f/13 and subject distance was 29cm therefore Dof is about 37mm 3.7mm and subject height is 35mm width is 60mm plus two subjects hence focal plane control was so tricky consequently taking all subject in focus was impossible + this luminous, f/13 was limit. The way of this shot is very similar as this shot or this shot. --Laitche (talk) 23:22, 8 June 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment @Laitche: You calculation seems to be a bit wrong! My calculation says: DOF = 3.7 mm (not 37mm) for a Pentax K10D camera and a 90mm lens. Please recalculate it here too. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:24, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
    • @Alchemist-hp: Yes, you are right. I've been mistaken a digit place, hahaha. so subject distance was maybe a little farther than 29cm but I don't remember exactly it's seven and half years ago... but nearly. --Laitche (talk) 08:30, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose I am not convinced either about the composition/subject/quality/DoF. Poco² 19:52, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
•  Support For me is a artistic shot --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:19, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:23, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects