Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2.png

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

File:Coronavirus. SARS-CoV-2.png, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2021 at 19:29:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Scientifically accurate atomic model of coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)
  • It looks more like a rainbow, and surely is not, the position of the receptors on the surface then has not been studied enough. If you see on google you will find various variations. For me it is too imaginative. Greetings.--Commonists 08:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Abstain It's great that all the sources have been listed and apparently some sort of scientist was consulted, but I think we (the FP voting community as a whole) are not qualified to ascertain the accuracy of this – I am certainly not. I think this kind of illustration should go through some kind of expert review/quality control before we give it the star. --El Grafo (talk) 08:38, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Support fine then! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:40, 14 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Nobody says it's wrong but nobody can say it's exact either....it's too early to be sure of the receptor composition and destruction or the conformation of the cell wall of the virus. I have a degree in biotechnology and anyway after only one year you cannot give certainty. Here we have to give a scientific value and for sure, at the moment, we are not able to do that. Thank you.--Commonists 12:05, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment We (Alexey Solodovnikov, Valerya Arkhipova) are grateful and grateful for doubts about the accuracy of our work. Therefore, we consulted Nikitin N.A., Doctor of Biological Sciences, Department of Virology and Borisevich S.S. Candidate of Chemical Sciences, Specialist in Molecular Modeling of Viral Surface Proteins. And this was good for the project. We have finalized the model. New sources of knowledge have been added to her description. Both of our consultants are aware of our project and have agreed to indicate their names. Thank you! Sorry for my English;). AlexeySolodovnikov (talk) 17:55, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Confirmed results:
Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated#Biology