Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cnidaria Luc Viatour.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cnidaria Luc Viatour.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2010 at 07:41:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
_Luc_Viatour.jpg)
Info created by Luc Viatour (talk) - uploaded by Luc Viatour (talk) - nominated by -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Support -- Luc Viatour (talk) 07:41, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
Oppose Probably a very difficult photograph, but noisy and unsharp. --Eusebius (talk) 09:57, 25 May 2010 (UTC)- Support beautiful colors and translucency, sharpness OK (though DOF is a bit low), noise in line with ISO settings. --ianaré (talk) 19:39, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support I don't find it unsharp at all. And I think what Eusebius says is noise are actually filaments on the jellyfish's body. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 19:46, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- En effet, la "peau" de la méduse est comme granuleuse (désolé pour la réponse en français) --Luc Viatour (talk) 20:09, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Translation of above message : Yes, the "skin" of the jellyfish has a granular texture (sorry for answering in French) --ianaré (talk) 11:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Info there is a white dead pixel, except this problem who is easy to correct the picture is beautiful, sharp, good colours and interesting composition. --Croucrou (talk) 22:47, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- corrigé et réduction du bruit apliquée --Luc Viatour (talk) 04:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support now it's perfect, i don't saw any noise, only the texture of the animal --Croucrou (talk) 10:57, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose -- Very nice composition but too much noise, caused by the very high ISO setting. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:30, 25 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support He had no choice but pushing ISO setting very far, otherwise he would have had to use wide aperture, which would have shallowed DOF. I think that it's a very good compromise overall, and 2800 iso for a D3S probably is much like 400/800 on older cameras such as my venerable 400D... :) Based on that, I guess that's the best we can get today. I've tried same shot at f/2.8, iso1600, and few years ago and don't get this good results (otherwise would have been on commons for loooong already). Here we have two for the same price.- Benh (talk) 05:20, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
Comment The species is not identified. Cnidaria is an animal phylum with over 9000 species. I'd like to support once the species id is given. Might it not be obtained from the Pairi Daiza Park? --Cayambe (talk) 13:51, 26 May 2010 (UTC)- Demande au parc effectuée this is "Aurelia aurita"--Luc Viatour (talk) 17:35, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support amazing creatures! Amada44 (talk) 17:38, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Brilliant shot Rastrojo (D•ES) 17:48, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Excellent picture of high educational value. --Tintero (talk) 18:18, 26 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:05, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Mbdortmund (talk) 13:27, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Brackenheim (talk) 16:41, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support yet another captive... Mais c'est magnifique. Pourrait entrer dans la catégorie "E.T. in space..." --Jebulon (talk) 23:47, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support • Richard • [®] • 10:14, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for the species identification. --Cayambe (talk) 19:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:09, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support – I don't know, how to make this photo in the dark sea without noise... --Steindy (talk) 22:25, 31 May 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Sémhur (talk) 12:07, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support--Sandahl (talk) 23:22, 2 June 2010 (UTC)
- Support --Avenue (talk) 02:03, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 19 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 3 June 2010 (UTC)
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals
