Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clark Humphrey 01A.jpg

File:Clark Humphrey 01A.jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jan 2012 at 07:10:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Clark Humphrey 01A.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Clark Humphrey 01A.jpg

•  Info created by Jmabel - uploaded by Jmabel - nominated by Jmabel -- Jmabel ! talk 07:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support -- Jmabel ! talk 07:10, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Strong oppose -- Not much to look at this image, nothing really special about it at all. TrebleSeven (talk) 16:52, 4 January 2012 (UTC) (no double voting, please) -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:49, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, it hasn't got any significant value, and I don't think it meets the featured image criteria. This image might be better off to be nominated at the English Wikipedia, as it does have a little bit of encyclopaedic value. TrebleSeven (talk) 17:13, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Info -- Sorry, but the FPX template is supposed to be used in objective and clear circumstances usually related with poor image quality or size. But the reason invoked here is subjective. I suggest you withdraw the template, otherwise I'll do it with a support vote. Alvesgaspar (talk) 18:37, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Support - interesting portraiture. I like the composition, and although the technical quality could be better, I can see this as a FP. --Claritas (talk) 20:30, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
•  OpposeAs TrebleSeven. Is it wov?--Miguel Bugallo 01:23, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose -- Out of focus, distracting background. Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:50, 5 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad background, bad focus etc. Kruusamägi (talk) 18:52, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't see any special about this? If anyone picture can be FP then we would have 7 billions of FP pictures.Trongphu (talk) 22:47, 7 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose Bad background. –ElmA (Talk – My files – E-mail) 15:58, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
•  Oppose The teeth yield a WOW factor to some extent but the background is too disturbed. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:57, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:30, 13 January 2012 (UTC)