Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cicindela duponti in Kadavoor.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Cicindela duponti in Kadavoor.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Sep 2015 at 06:37:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods
Info created by Jee - uploaded by Jee - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:37, 29 August 2015 (UTC)- Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 07:50, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 08:42, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:53, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:15, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --LivioAndronico (talk) 10:19, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
Comment It is a bit dark Poco2 11:47, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- I disagree. -- Colin (talk) 11:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- The actual lights here is more dull. Jee 12:16, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. -- Colin (talk) 11:52, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:23, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:32, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 17:08, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Superb. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 02:51, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Vengolis (talk) 04:55, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Sorry Jee, but it's a weak support. It is a very good photo, but the editing isn't quite consummate IMO. I agree with Poco as you know. --Hockei (talk) 12:20, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support Per Hockei Poco2 12:27, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Ivar (talk) 12:53, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 14:11, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 17:13, 30 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Hubertl 06:41, 31 August 2015 (UTC)
- Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:16, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Poco and Hockei: I just made a new edit using curves instead of brightness and contrast. Will revert if not better.
Adding an O to avoid speedy promotion.Jee 03:42, 3 September 2015 (UTC)- New image looks fine. It is a lot cooler, as well as brighter. -- Colin (talk) 07:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Agree, that was an improvement Poco2 15:47, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, but I'm not really convinced. What I see is an increased contrast and changed colour or white balance. It looks colder and the black or dark brown parts are deeper or more black than before (e.g. between the feelers). The colour in the version before I find better. I just would brighten it a little bit, not more. (Just my opinion.
) --Hockei (talk) 16:45, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Here color temperature is 4750 which is flash default. In earlier version, RawTherapee automatically lifted it to 6K, giving a warm tone. Now I found it and reverted to actual. :) Jee 17:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Jee you can't please everyone :-) -- Colin (talk) 18:18, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- New image looks fine. It is a lot cooler, as well as brighter. -- Colin (talk) 07:26, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, you mean Jee needs your sympathy. Because of my answer of his question. Have I said to him that he shall change the whole picture? No. Have I defeated his picture? No. Was it just a bit not bright enough for me? Yes. Has he ask me for my opinion? Yes. Shall I lie and say good when I don't find it? No. Can everybody say what he think? Yes. How many of my pictures were defeated? Many. Hm, I don't understand your statement at all. It is absolutely inappropriate. --Hockei (talk) 19:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hockei, what on earth is this rant about? I'm not questioning your review in any way at all. I made the very common observation that one cannot please everyone. It was intended to be lighthearted, hence the smilie. If there was any message in it, it was that if one keeps fiddling with an image in order to please one or two reviewers, then there's a good chance that one or two of the 19 who already supported might change their minds. -- Colin (talk) 07:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Colin, if it's not meant as I understood that, then everything is OK. But you have answered of my review. What would you think when you were me? Sometimes it's just better to think twice before writing in order to avoid misapprehensions like this. Good evening. --Hockei (talk) 16:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Yes; I too think it is only language difficulties. As a multi-lingual community, we are occasionally experiencing it. Jee 16:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Colin, if it's not meant as I understood that, then everything is OK. But you have answered of my review. What would you think when you were me? Sometimes it's just better to think twice before writing in order to avoid misapprehensions like this. Good evening. --Hockei (talk) 16:36, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Hockei, what on earth is this rant about? I'm not questioning your review in any way at all. I made the very common observation that one cannot please everyone. It was intended to be lighthearted, hence the smilie. If there was any message in it, it was that if one keeps fiddling with an image in order to please one or two reviewers, then there's a good chance that one or two of the 19 who already supported might change their minds. -- Colin (talk) 07:29, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Oh, you mean Jee needs your sympathy. Because of my answer of his question. Have I said to him that he shall change the whole picture? No. Have I defeated his picture? No. Was it just a bit not bright enough for me? Yes. Has he ask me for my opinion? Yes. Shall I lie and say good when I don't find it? No. Can everybody say what he think? Yes. How many of my pictures were defeated? Many. Hm, I don't understand your statement at all. It is absolutely inappropriate. --Hockei (talk) 19:01, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods
